PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EAGG vs. ESGD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EAGG vs. ESGD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Aware US Aggregate Bond ETF (EAGG) and iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF (ESGD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EAGG achieves a 0.54% return, which is significantly lower than ESGD's 9.85% return.


EAGG

1D
0.06%
1M
1.08%
YTD
0.54%
6M
0.85%
1Y
4.91%
3Y*
3.92%
5Y*
0.08%
10Y*

ESGD

1D
0.66%
1M
3.97%
YTD
9.85%
6M
10.51%
1Y
21.72%
3Y*
15.36%
5Y*
8.21%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EAGG vs. ESGD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
EAGG
iShares ESG Aware US Aggregate Bond ETF
0.54%7.18%1.12%5.58%-13.63%-1.30%7.40%8.68%2.19%
ESGD
iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF
9.85%29.63%3.95%18.53%-15.17%11.79%8.20%23.12%-6.21%

Correlation

The correlation between EAGG and ESGD is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2018

0.14

Over the past year, EAGG and ESGD have become more correlated (0.44) than their long-term average of 0.14, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EAGG vs. ESGD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EAGG
EAGG Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
EAGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAGG Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
EAGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAGG Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

ESGD
ESGD Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
ESGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESGD Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
ESGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESGD Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EAGG vs. ESGD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware US Aggregate Bond ETF (EAGG) and iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF (ESGD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EAGGESGDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.25

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.79

1.87

-0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.28

6.97

-1.68

EAGG vs. ESGD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EAGG Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is comparable to the ESGD Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EAGG and ESGD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EAGG vs. ESGD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EAGG drawdown since its inception was -18.74%, smaller than the maximum ESGD drawdown of -33.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAGG and ESGD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EAGGESGDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.74%

-33.70%

+14.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.75%

-11.68%

+8.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.20%

-13.86%

+7.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.98%

-30.03%

+12.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.53%

0.00%

-2.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.03%

-6.17%

+0.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.93%

3.13%

-2.20%

Volatility

EAGG vs. ESGD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares ESG Aware US Aggregate Bond ETF (EAGG) is 1.26%, while iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF (ESGD) has a volatility of 5.58%. This indicates that EAGG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ESGD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EAGGESGDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.26%

5.58%

-4.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.73%

13.32%

-10.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.72%

15.82%

-12.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.03%

16.73%

-10.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.49%

17.00%

-11.51%

EAGG vs. ESGD - Expense Ratio Comparison

EAGG has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than ESGD's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EAGG vs. ESGD - Dividend Comparison

EAGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%, less than ESGD's 4.92% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
EAGG
iShares ESG Aware US Aggregate Bond ETF
4.00%3.92%3.93%3.24%2.07%1.09%1.82%3.17%0.61%0.00%0.00%
ESGD
iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF
4.92%3.60%3.23%3.02%2.59%2.75%1.63%2.57%2.69%2.65%0.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


EAGG and ESGD have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ESGD has higher volatility (5.58%) compared to EAGG (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EAGG dropped -18.74% vs ESGD's -33.70%.

On 5-year performance, ESGD leads with 8.21% vs 0.08% for EAGG. On fees, EAGG is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, EAGG has been the lower-risk option at 1.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ESGD has performed better with a 8.21% return vs 0.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EAGG is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for ESGD.

ESGD has the higher dividend yield at 4.92%, compared with 4.00% for EAGG.

EAGG is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while ESGD is Foreign Large Cap Equities. EAGG tracks Bloomberg MSCI U.S. Aggregate ESG Focus Index, while ESGD tracks MSCI EAFE Extended ESG Focus Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for EAGG and 0.20% for ESGD.

ESGD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EAGG and ESGD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer