EAFG vs. PTNQ
EAFG (Pacer Developed Markets Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF) and PTNQ (Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EAFG is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Pacer Developed Markets Cash Cows Growth Leaders Index, while PTNQ is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Pacer NASDAQ-100 Trendpilot Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, EAFG returned 21.54% vs 16.96% for PTNQ. Their 0.68 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. Both charge a 0.65% expense ratio.
Performance
EAFG vs. PTNQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EAFG achieves a 6.96% return, which is significantly higher than PTNQ's 5.52% return.
EAFG
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -3.52%
- 6M
- 2.12%
- YTD
- 6.96%
- 1Y
- 21.54%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.72%
PTNQ
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- -3.51%
- 6M
- 4.32%
- YTD
- 5.52%
- 1Y
- 16.96%
- 3Y*
- 10.96%
- 5Y*
- 9.14%
- 10Y*
- 14.82%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.12%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $5.23K | $5.79K | $11.97K | |
| $3.10M | $2.47M | $2.76M |
EAFG vs. PTNQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EAFG Pacer Developed Markets Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF | 6.96% | 26.39% | -5.92% |
PTNQ Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF | 5.52% | 7.18% | 9.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between EAFG and PTNQ is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2024 | 0.68 |
The correlation between EAFG and PTNQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EAFG vs. PTNQ — Risk / Return Rank
EAFG
PTNQ
EAFG vs. PTNQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Developed Markets Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (EAFG) and Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EAFG | PTNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.15 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.71 | 1.26 | +0.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.57 | 3.67 | +1.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EAFG vs. PTNQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EAFG drawdown since its inception was -16.47%, smaller than the maximum PTNQ drawdown of -28.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAFG and PTNQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EAFG | PTNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.47% | -28.07% | +11.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.71% | -11.76% | -0.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.46% | -7.71% | +0.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.27% | -5.67% | +2.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.90% | 4.03% | -0.13% |
Volatility
EAFG vs. PTNQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer Developed Markets Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (EAFG) is 6.34%, while Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ) has a volatility of 6.89%. This indicates that EAFG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTNQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EAFG | PTNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.34% | 6.89% | -0.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.11% | 15.16% | +1.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.37% | 18.70% | +0.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.88% | 13.78% | +4.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.88% | 16.62% | +1.26% |
EAFG vs. PTNQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EAFG and PTNQ have an expense ratio of 0.65%.
Dividends
EAFG vs. PTNQ - Dividend Comparison
EAFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, more than PTNQ's 0.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAFG Pacer Developed Markets Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF | 2.04% | 1.31% | 1.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PTNQ Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF | 0.84% | 0.88% | 1.96% | 1.47% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.16% | 0.44% | 0.45% | 0.32% | 0.30% | 0.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EAFG and PTNQ have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PTNQ has higher volatility (6.89%) compared to EAFG (6.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EAFG dropped -16.47% vs PTNQ's -28.07%.
On 1-year performance, EAFG leads with 21.54% vs 16.96% for PTNQ. Both ETFs have the same 0.65% expense ratio. On volatility, EAFG has been the lower-risk option at 6.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EAFG has performed better with a 21.54% return vs 16.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EAFG and PTNQ have the same expense ratio: 0.65% per year.
EAFG has the higher dividend yield at 2.04%, compared with 0.84% for PTNQ.
EAFG is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while PTNQ is Large Cap Blend Equities. EAFG tracks Pacer Developed Markets Cash Cows Growth Leaders Index, while PTNQ tracks Pacer NASDAQ-100 Trendpilot Index.
EAFG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EAFG and PTNQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer