EAFG vs. JHID

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

EAFG (Pacer Developed Markets Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF) and JHID (John Hancock International High Dividend ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. EAFG is passively managed, while JHID is actively managed. Over the past year, EAFG returned 20.16% vs 31.71% for JHID. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EAFG charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for JHID.

Performance

EAFG vs. JHID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Developed Markets Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (EAFG) and John Hancock International High Dividend ETF (JHID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EAFG achieves a 8.64% return, which is significantly lower than JHID's 14.58% return.

EAFG

• 1D: -1.72%
• 1M: -4.32%
• 6M: 4.28%
• YTD: 8.64%
• 1Y: 20.16%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

JHID

• 1D: -0.44%
• 1M: -0.18%
• 6M: 10.79%
• YTD: 14.58%
• 1Y: 31.71%
• 3Y*: 19.96%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EAFG vs. JHID - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EAFG Pacer Developed Markets Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF	8.64%	26.39%	-5.92%
JHID John Hancock International High Dividend ETF	14.58%	41.47%	-0.51%

Correlation

The correlation between EAFG and JHID is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2024	0.82

The correlation between EAFG and JHID has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

EAFG vs. JHID - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EAFG	JHID
Technology	33.7%	9.6%
Industrials	14.7%	15.7%
Healthcare	14.0%	6.4%
Basic Materials	9.2%	6.6%
Consumer Cyclical	8.0%	4.8%
Communication Services	7.9%	2.8%
Consumer Defensive	3.6%	7.9%
Energy	2.5%	6.0%
Utilities	1.8%	5.8%
Financial Services	0.6%	28.6%
Real Estate	-	5.8%

Return for Risk

EAFG vs. JHID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EAFG

EAFG Risk / Return Rank: 37
EAFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
EAFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
EAFG Omega Ratio Rank: 34
EAFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
EAFG Martin Ratio Rank: 43

JHID

JHID Risk / Return Rank: 88
JHID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
JHID Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
JHID Omega Ratio Rank: 89
JHID Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
JHID Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EAFG vs. JHID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Developed Markets Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (EAFG) and John Hancock International High Dividend ETF (JHID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EAFG	JHID	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.06	2.45	-1.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.52	3.42	-1.91
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.44	-0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.59	3.78	-2.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.59	14.44	-8.84

EAFG vs. JHID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EAFG Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is lower than the JHID Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EAFG and JHID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EAFG vs. JHID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EAFG drawdown since its inception was -16.47%, which is greater than JHID's maximum drawdown of -12.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAFG and JHID.

Drawdown Indicators

	EAFG	JHID	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.47%	-12.42%	-4.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.71%	-8.42%	-4.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-12.42%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.00%	-0.44%	-5.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.19%	-2.43%	-0.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.62%	2.20%	+1.42%

Volatility

EAFG vs. JHID - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Developed Markets Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (EAFG) has a higher volatility of 6.78% compared to John Hancock International High Dividend ETF (JHID) at 3.19%. This indicates that EAFG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JHID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EAFG	JHID	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.78%	3.19%	+3.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.82%	11.09%	+5.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.06%	13.03%	+6.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.81%	13.90%	+3.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.81%	13.90%	+3.91%

EAFG vs. JHID - Expense Ratio Comparison

EAFG has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than JHID's 0.46% expense ratio.

Dividends

EAFG vs. JHID - Dividend Comparison

EAFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%, less than JHID's 3.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
EAFG Pacer Developed Markets Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF	2.01%	1.31%	1.99%	0.00%
JHID John Hancock International High Dividend ETF	3.42%	3.13%	5.15%	5.23%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EAFG and JHID in my portfolio?

EAFG and JHID have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EAFG or JHID?

EAFG has higher volatility (6.78%) compared to JHID (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EAFG dropped -16.47% vs JHID's -12.42%.

Which ETF is better, EAFG or JHID?

On 1-year performance, JHID leads with 31.71% vs 20.16% for EAFG. On fees, JHID is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, JHID has been the lower-risk option at 3.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EAFG or JHID?

Over the 1-year period, JHID has performed better with a 31.71% return vs 20.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EAFG or JHID?

JHID is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for EAFG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EAFG or JHID?

JHID has the higher dividend yield at 3.42%, compared with 2.01% for EAFG.

What is the main difference between EAFG and JHID?

They also come from different issuers: Pacer and John Hancock. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for EAFG and 0.46% for JHID.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JHID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.