PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EAEAX vs. WFSPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EAEAX vs. WFSPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Equity Asset Allocation Fund (EAEAX) and iShares S&P 500 Index Fund (WFSPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EAEAX achieves a 8.70% return, which is significantly lower than WFSPX's 10.87% return. Over the past 10 years, EAEAX has underperformed WFSPX with an annualized return of 11.63%, while WFSPX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.46% annualized return.


EAEAX

1D
-0.50%
1M
2.64%
YTD
8.70%
6M
8.82%
1Y
20.70%
3Y*
16.77%
5Y*
9.12%
10Y*
11.63%

WFSPX

1D
-0.74%
1M
4.17%
YTD
10.87%
6M
10.77%
1Y
27.97%
3Y*
22.41%
5Y*
13.88%
10Y*
15.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EAEAX vs. WFSPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EAEAX
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Equity Asset Allocation Fund
8.70%12.06%17.99%20.69%-18.19%21.24%15.47%27.44%-5.86%19.16%
WFSPX
iShares S&P 500 Index Fund
10.87%17.83%24.94%26.25%-18.14%28.63%18.43%31.45%-4.83%21.27%

Correlation

The correlation between EAEAX and WFSPX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2002

0.97

The correlation between EAEAX and WFSPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EAEAX vs. WFSPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EAEAX
EAEAX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
EAEAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAEAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAEAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
EAEAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAEAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

WFSPX
WFSPX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
WFSPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WFSPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
WFSPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
WFSPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
WFSPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EAEAX vs. WFSPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Equity Asset Allocation Fund (EAEAX) and iShares S&P 500 Index Fund (WFSPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EAEAXWFSPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.43

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.23

3.16

-0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.17

14.75

-4.58

EAEAX vs. WFSPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EAEAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the WFSPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EAEAX and WFSPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EAEAXWFSPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.85

2.37

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.83

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

0.86

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.13

+0.34

Drawdowns

EAEAX vs. WFSPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EAEAX drawdown since its inception was -53.71%, smaller than the maximum WFSPX drawdown of -58.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAEAX and WFSPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EAEAXWFSPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.71%

-58.21%

+4.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.37%

-8.90%

-0.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.69%

-18.74%

+1.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.72%

-24.51%

-0.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.74%

-33.74%

-1.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.50%

-0.74%

+0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.82%

-12.77%

+4.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

1.90%

+0.15%

Volatility

EAEAX vs. WFSPX - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Equity Asset Allocation Fund (EAEAX) and iShares S&P 500 Index Fund (WFSPX) have volatilities of 2.98% and 2.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EAEAXWFSPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.98%

2.92%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.63%

8.99%

-0.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.30%

11.88%

-0.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.67%

16.88%

-1.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.84%

18.02%

-1.18%

EAEAX vs. WFSPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EAEAX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than WFSPX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

EAEAX vs. WFSPX - Dividend Comparison

EAEAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%, more than WFSPX's 1.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EAEAX
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Equity Asset Allocation Fund
3.95%4.29%0.80%0.53%0.79%2.58%0.57%1.87%2.12%3.13%1.10%6.32%
WFSPX
iShares S&P 500 Index Fund
1.58%1.72%1.41%1.50%2.02%1.82%1.66%1.99%2.00%1.62%2.37%2.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, EAEAX and WFSPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EAEAX has higher volatility (2.98%) compared to WFSPX (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EAEAX dropped -53.71% vs WFSPX's -58.21%.

WFSPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EAEAX and WFSPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer