PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EADOX vs. RCTIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EADOX vs. RCTIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund Class A (EADOX) and River Canyon Total Return Bond Fund (RCTIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EADOX achieves a 7.49% return, which is significantly higher than RCTIX's 0.81% return. Over the past 10 years, EADOX has outperformed RCTIX with an annualized return of 7.84%, while RCTIX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.59% annualized return.


EADOX

1D
0.12%
1M
1.46%
YTD
7.49%
6M
8.20%
1Y
18.96%
3Y*
14.81%
5Y*
8.33%
10Y*
7.84%

RCTIX

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.60%
YTD
0.81%
6M
0.96%
1Y
4.41%
3Y*
7.39%
5Y*
4.44%
10Y*
5.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EADOX vs. RCTIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EADOX
Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund Class A
7.49%16.93%14.52%11.13%-6.42%1.24%7.12%17.85%-4.44%12.58%
RCTIX
River Canyon Total Return Bond Fund
0.81%7.75%7.49%10.02%-4.07%4.26%6.42%11.71%1.82%9.76%

Correlation

The correlation between EADOX and RCTIX is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EADOX vs. RCTIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EADOX
EADOX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
EADOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EADOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
EADOX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
EADOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
EADOX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

RCTIX
RCTIX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
RCTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RCTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
RCTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
RCTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
RCTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EADOX vs. RCTIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund Class A (EADOX) and River Canyon Total Return Bond Fund (RCTIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EADOXRCTIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.57

1.40

+1.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.27

3.87

+1.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.39

12.78

+8.61

EADOX vs. RCTIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EADOX Sharpe Ratio is 5.57, which is higher than the RCTIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EADOX and RCTIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EADOX vs. RCTIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EADOX drawdown since its inception was -19.15%, which is greater than RCTIX's maximum drawdown of -10.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EADOX and RCTIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EADOXRCTIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.15%

-10.89%

-8.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.61%

-1.20%

-2.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.61%

-1.48%

-2.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.56%

-6.17%

-11.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.15%

-10.89%

-8.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-0.30%

+0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.52%

-1.08%

-1.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.89%

0.36%

+0.53%

Volatility

EADOX vs. RCTIX - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund Class A (EADOX) has a higher volatility of 0.78% compared to River Canyon Total Return Bond Fund (RCTIX) at 0.74%. This indicates that EADOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RCTIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EADOXRCTIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.78%

0.74%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.01%

1.85%

+1.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.43%

2.32%

+1.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.58%

2.50%

+2.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.70%

3.74%

+0.96%

EADOX vs. RCTIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EADOX has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is higher than RCTIX's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

EADOX vs. RCTIX - Dividend Comparison

EADOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.36%, more than RCTIX's 7.26% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
EADOX
Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund Class A
10.36%10.51%8.27%8.73%8.87%7.56%7.42%7.57%7.83%7.61%4.04%
RCTIX
River Canyon Total Return Bond Fund
7.26%7.31%7.89%8.50%5.98%3.02%5.97%4.97%3.30%4.89%2.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


EADOX and RCTIX have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EADOX has higher volatility (0.78%) compared to RCTIX (0.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EADOX dropped -19.15% vs RCTIX's -10.89%.

EADOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.57 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EADOX and RCTIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer