PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EADIX vs. GMGEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EADIX vs. GMGEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Dividend Income Fund (EADIX) and GMO Global Equity Allocation Fund (GMGEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EADIX achieves a 10.51% return, which is significantly lower than GMGEX's 19.85% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EADIX having a 11.36% annualized return and GMGEX not far behind at 11.33%.


EADIX

1D
-0.05%
1M
5.76%
YTD
10.51%
6M
12.33%
1Y
27.54%
3Y*
18.30%
5Y*
10.28%
10Y*
11.36%

GMGEX

1D
0.65%
1M
7.86%
YTD
19.85%
6M
21.91%
1Y
42.42%
3Y*
21.98%
5Y*
10.11%
10Y*
11.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EADIX vs. GMGEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EADIX
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Dividend Income Fund
10.51%23.11%8.75%25.02%-18.77%23.18%14.32%28.50%-11.44%20.02%
GMGEX
GMO Global Equity Allocation Fund
19.85%29.14%4.12%22.27%-17.07%14.99%9.55%25.45%-13.04%26.39%

Correlation

The correlation between EADIX and GMGEX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2003

0.92

The correlation between EADIX and GMGEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EADIX vs. GMGEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EADIX
EADIX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
EADIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EADIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
EADIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
EADIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
EADIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

GMGEX
GMGEX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
GMGEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMGEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMGEX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
GMGEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMGEX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EADIX vs. GMGEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Dividend Income Fund (EADIX) and GMO Global Equity Allocation Fund (GMGEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EADIXGMGEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.62

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

4.61

-2.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.68

18.29

-7.61

EADIX vs. GMGEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EADIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is lower than the GMGEX Sharpe Ratio of 3.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EADIX and GMGEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EADIXGMGEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06

3.37

-1.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.69

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.71

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.25

+0.25

Drawdowns

EADIX vs. GMGEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EADIX drawdown since its inception was -52.70%, smaller than the maximum GMGEX drawdown of -58.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EADIX and GMGEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EADIXGMGEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.70%

-58.47%

+5.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.12%

-9.24%

-1.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.32%

-17.12%

+0.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.71%

-28.58%

+0.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.34%

-34.98%

-0.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.05%

0.00%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.16%

-16.75%

+8.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.58%

2.32%

+0.26%

Volatility

EADIX vs. GMGEX - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Dividend Income Fund (EADIX) and GMO Global Equity Allocation Fund (GMGEX) have volatilities of 4.06% and 4.04%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EADIXGMGEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.06%

4.04%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.88%

9.91%

+0.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.46%

12.65%

+0.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.84%

14.81%

+2.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.69%

16.06%

+1.63%

EADIX vs. GMGEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EADIX has a 1.18% expense ratio, which is higher than GMGEX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

EADIX vs. GMGEX - Dividend Comparison

EADIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.36%, less than GMGEX's 3.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EADIX
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Dividend Income Fund
3.36%3.38%4.15%3.97%5.42%6.52%3.12%3.18%3.95%3.09%3.92%3.84%
GMGEX
GMO Global Equity Allocation Fund
3.91%4.69%0.29%5.62%7.81%7.76%3.83%3.14%3.14%2.90%3.71%4.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, EADIX and GMGEX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EADIX has higher volatility (4.06%) compared to GMGEX (4.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EADIX dropped -52.70% vs GMGEX's -58.47%.

GMGEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.37 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EADIX and GMGEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer