EADIX vs. CSUAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Dividend Income Fund (EADIX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX).
EADIX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on May 29, 2003. CSUAX is a passively managed fund by Cohen & Steers that tracks the performance of the FTSE Global Core Infrastructure 50/50 Index. It was launched on Aug 28, 2017.
Performance
EADIX vs. CSUAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EADIX vs. CSUAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EADIX Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Dividend Income Fund | -6.50% | 23.11% | 8.75% | 25.02% | -18.77% | 23.18% | 14.32% | 28.50% | -11.44% | 20.02% |
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 8.35% | 14.30% | 8.30% | 2.09% | -5.20% | 16.24% | -1.65% | 24.26% | -5.83% | 17.99% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EADIX achieves a -6.50% return, which is significantly lower than CSUAX's 8.35% return. Over the past 10 years, EADIX has outperformed CSUAX with an annualized return of 9.76%, while CSUAX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.48% annualized return.
EADIX
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -10.13%
- YTD
- -6.50%
- 6M
- -0.47%
- 1Y
- 15.01%
- 3Y*
- 13.36%
- 5Y*
- 8.28%
- 10Y*
- 9.76%
CSUAX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -4.38%
- YTD
- 8.35%
- 6M
- 8.97%
- 1Y
- 17.98%
- 3Y*
- 10.78%
- 5Y*
- 7.79%
- 10Y*
- 7.48%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EADIX vs. CSUAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EADIX has a 1.18% expense ratio, which is lower than CSUAX's 1.22% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EADIX vs. CSUAX — Risk / Return Rank
EADIX
CSUAX
EADIX vs. CSUAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Dividend Income Fund (EADIX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EADIX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.83 | 1.63 | -0.80 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.27 | 2.17 | -0.90 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.32 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.11 | 2.36 | -1.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.73 | 10.32 | -5.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EADIX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 | 1.63 | -0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.61 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.50 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.55 | -0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between EADIX and CSUAX is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EADIX vs. CSUAX - Dividend Comparison
EADIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%, less than CSUAX's 7.46% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EADIX Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Dividend Income Fund | 3.95% | 3.38% | 4.15% | 3.97% | 5.42% | 6.52% | 3.12% | 3.18% | 3.95% | 3.09% | 3.92% | 3.84% |
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 7.46% | 8.09% | 2.23% | 2.17% | 3.55% | 2.95% | 1.30% | 1.52% | 2.08% | 5.00% | 2.04% | 6.20% |
Drawdowns
EADIX vs. CSUAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EADIX drawdown since its inception was -52.70%, roughly equal to the maximum CSUAX drawdown of -52.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EADIX and CSUAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EADIX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.70% | -52.20% | -0.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.01% | -7.98% | -4.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.71% | -20.45% | -7.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.34% | -35.05% | -0.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.12% | -4.38% | -6.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.21% | -8.49% | +0.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.81% | 1.83% | +0.98% |
Volatility
EADIX vs. CSUAX - Volatility Comparison
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Dividend Income Fund (EADIX) has a higher volatility of 5.69% compared to Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) at 3.26%. This indicates that EADIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSUAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EADIX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.69% | 3.26% | +2.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.91% | 6.89% | +3.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.01% | 11.48% | +6.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.70% | 12.89% | +3.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.59% | 14.89% | +2.70% |