EACC.NEO vs. ZLI.TO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EACC.NEO (Global X MSCI EAFE Covered Call ETF) and ZLI.TO (BMO Low Volatility International Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EACC.NEO is a Derivative Income fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Index, while ZLI.TO is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by BMO. EACC.NEO is passively managed, while ZLI.TO is actively managed. Over the past year, EACC.NEO returned 20.09% vs 0.38% for ZLI.TO. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EACC.NEO charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for ZLI.TO.

Performance

EACC.NEO vs. ZLI.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X MSCI EAFE Covered Call ETF (EACC.NEO) and BMO Low Volatility International Equity ETF (ZLI.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EACC.NEO achieves a 8.26% return, which is significantly higher than ZLI.TO's 1.65% return.

EACC.NEO

• 1D: 0.66%
• 1M: 4.81%
• YTD: 8.26%
• 6M: 8.64%
• 1Y: 20.09%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ZLI.TO

• 1D: 0.87%
• 1M: 0.87%
• YTD: 1.65%
• 6M: 0.67%
• 1Y: 0.38%
• 3Y*: 9.91%
• 5Y*: 5.91%
• 10Y*: 5.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EACC.NEO vs. ZLI.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EACC.NEO Global X MSCI EAFE Covered Call ETF	8.26%	18.86%	0.72%
ZLI.TO BMO Low Volatility International Equity ETF	1.65%	12.93%	6.30%

Correlation

The correlation between EACC.NEO and ZLI.TO is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2024	0.55

The correlation between EACC.NEO and ZLI.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EACC.NEO vs. ZLI.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EACC.NEO

EACC.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 39
EACC.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
EACC.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
EACC.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 43
EACC.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
EACC.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 39

ZLI.TO

ZLI.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9
ZLI.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
ZLI.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
ZLI.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9
ZLI.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
ZLI.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EACC.NEO vs. ZLI.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI EAFE Covered Call ETF (EACC.NEO) and BMO Low Volatility International Equity ETF (ZLI.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EACC.NEO	ZLI.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.35	0.04	+1.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.83	0.12	+1.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.02	+0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.79	0.05	+1.74
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.14	0.12	+6.02
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EACC.NEO vs. ZLI.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EACC.NEO Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is higher than the ZLI.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EACC.NEO and ZLI.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EACC.NEO	ZLI.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.35	0.04	+1.31
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.55	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.45	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.91	0.49	+0.42

Drawdowns

EACC.NEO vs. ZLI.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EACC.NEO drawdown since its inception was -13.35%, smaller than the maximum ZLI.TO drawdown of -24.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EACC.NEO and ZLI.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	EACC.NEO	ZLI.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.35%	-24.67%	+11.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.30%	-8.37%	-2.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-8.37%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.67%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-24.67%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.08%	-5.97%	+5.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.09%	-4.99%	+2.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.28%	3.31%	-0.03%

Volatility

EACC.NEO vs. ZLI.TO - Volatility Comparison

Global X MSCI EAFE Covered Call ETF (EACC.NEO) has a higher volatility of 4.26% compared to BMO Low Volatility International Equity ETF (ZLI.TO) at 3.67%. This indicates that EACC.NEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZLI.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EACC.NEO	ZLI.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.26%	3.67%	+0.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.79%	8.33%	+4.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.97%	10.31%	+4.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.05%	10.78%	+4.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.05%	12.41%	+2.64%

EACC.NEO vs. ZLI.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EACC.NEO has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than ZLI.TO's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

EACC.NEO vs. ZLI.TO - Dividend Comparison

EACC.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.43%, more than ZLI.TO's 2.21% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EACC.NEO Global X MSCI EAFE Covered Call ETF	7.43%	7.55%	5.12%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ZLI.TO BMO Low Volatility International Equity ETF	2.21%	2.24%	2.47%	2.69%	2.86%	2.50%	2.65%	2.35%	2.48%	2.21%	2.49%	0.91%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EACC.NEO and ZLI.TO in my portfolio?

EACC.NEO and ZLI.TO have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EACC.NEO or ZLI.TO?

On fees, ZLI.TO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EACC.NEO or ZLI.TO?

ZLI.TO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EACC.NEO.

What is the main difference between EACC.NEO and ZLI.TO?

EACC.NEO is categorized as Derivative Income, while ZLI.TO is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: Global X and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EACC.NEO and 0.40% for ZLI.TO.