EACC.NEO vs. AVGY.TO
EACC.NEO (Global X MSCI EAFE Covered Call ETF) and AVGY.TO (Harvest Broadcom Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units) are both Derivative Income funds. EACC.NEO is passively managed, while AVGY.TO is actively managed. Over the past year, EACC.NEO returned 19.76% vs 107.90% for AVGY.TO. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EACC.NEO charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for AVGY.TO.
Performance
EACC.NEO vs. AVGY.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EACC.NEO achieves a 7.82% return, which is significantly lower than AVGY.TO's 42.92% return.
EACC.NEO
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 6.14%
- YTD
- 7.82%
- 6M
- 8.11%
- 1Y
- 19.76%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AVGY.TO
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 19.17%
- YTD
- 42.92%
- 6M
- 27.21%
- 1Y
- 107.90%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EACC.NEO vs. AVGY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EACC.NEO Global X MSCI EAFE Covered Call ETF | 7.82% | 9.65% |
AVGY.TO Harvest Broadcom Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units | 42.92% | 83.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between EACC.NEO and AVGY.TO is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2025 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EACC.NEO vs. AVGY.TO — Risk / Return Rank
EACC.NEO
AVGY.TO
EACC.NEO vs. AVGY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI EAFE Covered Call ETF (EACC.NEO) and Harvest Broadcom Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (AVGY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EACC.NEO | AVGY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.38 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.76 | 3.81 | -2.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.04 | 8.81 | -2.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EACC.NEO | AVGY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.33 | 2.39 | -1.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.89 | 2.30 | -1.40 |
Drawdowns
EACC.NEO vs. AVGY.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EACC.NEO drawdown since its inception was -13.35%, smaller than the maximum AVGY.TO drawdown of -28.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EACC.NEO and AVGY.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EACC.NEO | AVGY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.35% | -28.78% | +15.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.30% | -28.50% | +17.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.48% | -0.45% | -0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.09% | -8.43% | +6.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.28% | 12.29% | -9.01% |
Volatility
EACC.NEO vs. AVGY.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X MSCI EAFE Covered Call ETF (EACC.NEO) is 4.43%, while Harvest Broadcom Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (AVGY.TO) has a volatility of 13.20%. This indicates that EACC.NEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVGY.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EACC.NEO | AVGY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.43% | 13.20% | -8.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.76% | 33.23% | -20.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.96% | 45.46% | -30.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.05% | 51.13% | -36.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.05% | 51.13% | -36.08% |
EACC.NEO vs. AVGY.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
EACC.NEO has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than AVGY.TO's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
EACC.NEO vs. AVGY.TO - Dividend Comparison
EACC.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.46%, less than AVGY.TO's 19.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
AVGY.TO Harvest Broadcom Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units | 19.08% | 14.82% | 0.00% |
EACC.NEO Global X MSCI EAFE Covered Call ETF | 7.46% | 7.55% | 5.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EACC.NEO and AVGY.TO have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AVGY.TO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AVGY.TO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EACC.NEO.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and Harvest. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EACC.NEO and 0.40% for AVGY.TO.
Find the right allocation for EACC.NEO and AVGY.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer