EACC.NEO vs. HUTE.TO
EACC.NEO (Global X MSCI EAFE Covered Call ETF) and HUTE.TO (Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. EACC.NEO is passively managed, while HUTE.TO is actively managed. Over the past year, EACC.NEO returned 20.09% vs 19.90% for HUTE.TO. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EACC.NEO charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HUTE.TO.
Performance
EACC.NEO vs. HUTE.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EACC.NEO achieves a 8.26% return, which is significantly lower than HUTE.TO's 12.60% return.
EACC.NEO
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- 4.81%
- YTD
- 8.26%
- 6M
- 8.64%
- 1Y
- 20.09%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HUTE.TO
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 0.03%
- YTD
- 12.60%
- 6M
- 12.98%
- 1Y
- 19.90%
- 3Y*
- 15.88%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EACC.NEO vs. HUTE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EACC.NEO Global X MSCI EAFE Covered Call ETF | 8.26% | 18.86% | 0.72% |
HUTE.TO Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF | 12.60% | 19.04% | 7.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between EACC.NEO and HUTE.TO is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2024 | 0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EACC.NEO vs. HUTE.TO — Risk / Return Rank
EACC.NEO
HUTE.TO
EACC.NEO vs. HUTE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI EAFE Covered Call ETF (EACC.NEO) and Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF (HUTE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EACC.NEO | HUTE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.32 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.79 | 4.37 | -2.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.14 | 11.25 | -5.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EACC.NEO | HUTE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.35 | 1.75 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 1.11 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
EACC.NEO vs. HUTE.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EACC.NEO drawdown since its inception was -13.35%, smaller than the maximum HUTE.TO drawdown of -18.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EACC.NEO and HUTE.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EACC.NEO | HUTE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.35% | -18.36% | +5.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.30% | -4.57% | -6.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.25% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.08% | -4.29% | +4.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.09% | -3.86% | +1.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.28% | 1.77% | +1.51% |
Volatility
EACC.NEO vs. HUTE.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X MSCI EAFE Covered Call ETF (EACC.NEO) is 4.26%, while Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF (HUTE.TO) has a volatility of 5.03%. This indicates that EACC.NEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HUTE.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EACC.NEO | HUTE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.26% | 5.03% | -0.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.79% | 9.72% | +3.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.97% | 11.43% | +3.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.05% | 14.33% | +0.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.05% | 14.33% | +0.72% |
EACC.NEO vs. HUTE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
EACC.NEO has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than HUTE.TO's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
EACC.NEO vs. HUTE.TO - Dividend Comparison
EACC.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.43%, less than HUTE.TO's 9.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EACC.NEO Global X MSCI EAFE Covered Call ETF | 7.43% | 7.55% | 5.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HUTE.TO Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF | 9.20% | 9.64% | 10.24% | 10.70% | 1.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EACC.NEO and HUTE.TO have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EACC.NEO is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EACC.NEO is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HUTE.TO.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and Harvest. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EACC.NEO and 0.50% for HUTE.TO.
Find the right allocation for EACC.NEO and HUTE.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer