PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EACAX vs. BMN
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EACAX vs. BMN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance California Municipal Opportunities Fund (EACAX) and Blackrock 2037 Municipal Target Term Trust (BMN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EACAX vs. BMN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
EACAX
Eaton Vance California Municipal Opportunities Fund
-0.62%3.85%3.25%6.45%4.75%
BMN
Blackrock 2037 Municipal Target Term Trust
0.14%7.05%12.65%1.89%-2.55%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EACAX achieves a -0.62% return, which is significantly lower than BMN's 0.14% return.


EACAX

1D
0.20%
1M
-2.73%
YTD
-0.62%
6M
1.06%
1Y
3.32%
3Y*
3.36%
5Y*
1.23%
10Y*
2.25%

BMN

1D
-0.69%
1M
-4.61%
YTD
0.14%
6M
5.70%
1Y
7.01%
3Y*
5.71%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EACAX vs. BMN - Expense Ratio Comparison

EACAX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is lower than BMN's 0.93% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EACAX vs. BMN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EACAX
EACAX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
EACAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EACAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
EACAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
EACAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
EACAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

BMN
BMN Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
BMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
BMN Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
BMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
BMN Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EACAX vs. BMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance California Municipal Opportunities Fund (EACAX) and Blackrock 2037 Municipal Target Term Trust (BMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EACAXBMNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.75

0.58

+0.18

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.03

0.93

+0.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.11

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.82

1.17

-0.35

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.43

3.10

-0.68

EACAX vs. BMN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EACAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is higher than the BMN Sharpe Ratio of 0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EACAX and BMN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EACAXBMNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

0.58

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.00

0.52

+0.47

Correlation

The correlation between EACAX and BMN is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

EACAX vs. BMN - Dividend Comparison

EACAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, less than BMN's 4.34% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EACAX
Eaton Vance California Municipal Opportunities Fund
3.55%4.30%3.88%3.18%2.09%1.53%2.04%3.00%2.61%2.52%2.74%3.52%
BMN
Blackrock 2037 Municipal Target Term Trust
4.34%4.30%4.40%4.74%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

EACAX vs. BMN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EACAX drawdown since its inception was -25.41%, which is greater than BMN's maximum drawdown of -13.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EACAX and BMN.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EACAXBMNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.41%

-13.04%

-12.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.53%

-5.92%

+0.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.73%

-5.44%

+2.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.43%

-2.17%

-0.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.87%

2.53%

-0.66%

Volatility

EACAX vs. BMN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance California Municipal Opportunities Fund (EACAX) is 1.08%, while Blackrock 2037 Municipal Target Term Trust (BMN) has a volatility of 5.62%. This indicates that EACAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BMN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EACAXBMNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.08%

5.62%

-4.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.79%

9.47%

-7.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.48%

12.23%

-6.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.88%

10.52%

-6.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.65%

10.52%

-6.87%