PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BMN vs. CBTAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BMN vs. CBTAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blackrock 2037 Municipal Target Term Trust (BMN) and Six Circles Tax Aware Bond Fund (CBTAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BMN vs. CBTAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BMN
Blackrock 2037 Municipal Target Term Trust
1.11%7.05%12.65%1.89%-2.55%
CBTAX
Six Circles Tax Aware Bond Fund
-0.26%4.13%2.38%6.35%4.65%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BMN achieves a 1.11% return, which is significantly higher than CBTAX's -0.26% return.


BMN

1D
0.96%
1M
-4.53%
YTD
1.11%
6M
6.76%
1Y
9.12%
3Y*
6.05%
5Y*
10Y*

CBTAX

1D
0.31%
1M
-2.01%
YTD
-0.26%
6M
1.04%
1Y
3.71%
3Y*
3.32%
5Y*
1.19%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BMN vs. CBTAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BMN has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than CBTAX's 0.14% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BMN vs. CBTAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BMN
BMN Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
BMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
BMN Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
BMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
BMN Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

CBTAX
CBTAX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
CBTAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBTAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBTAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
CBTAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBTAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BMN vs. CBTAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackrock 2037 Municipal Target Term Trust (BMN) and Six Circles Tax Aware Bond Fund (CBTAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BMNCBTAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.75

0.96

-0.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.18

1.28

-0.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.28

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.36

1.06

+0.30

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.59

3.83

-0.24

BMN vs. CBTAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BMN Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is comparable to the CBTAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BMN and CBTAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BMNCBTAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

0.96

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.56

-0.01

Correlation

The correlation between BMN and CBTAX is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

BMN vs. CBTAX - Dividend Comparison

BMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.30%, more than CBTAX's 3.23% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
BMN
Blackrock 2037 Municipal Target Term Trust
4.30%4.30%4.40%4.74%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CBTAX
Six Circles Tax Aware Bond Fund
3.23%3.49%3.28%2.68%1.57%0.88%0.49%

Drawdowns

BMN vs. CBTAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMN drawdown since its inception was -13.04%, which is greater than CBTAX's maximum drawdown of -12.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMN and CBTAX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BMNCBTAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.04%

-12.12%

-0.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.92%

-4.30%

-1.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.53%

-2.21%

-2.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.17%

-2.82%

+0.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

1.20%

+1.04%

Volatility

BMN vs. CBTAX - Volatility Comparison

Blackrock 2037 Municipal Target Term Trust (BMN) has a higher volatility of 5.73% compared to Six Circles Tax Aware Bond Fund (CBTAX) at 0.99%. This indicates that BMN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBTAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BMNCBTAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.73%

0.99%

+4.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.49%

1.40%

+8.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.24%

4.23%

+8.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.52%

3.38%

+7.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.52%

3.18%

+7.34%