E61Z.DE vs. QYLE.DE
E61Z.DE (Global X E-commerce UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) and QYLE.DE (Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF D) are both exchange-traded funds - E61Z.DE is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the Solactive E-commerce, while QYLE.DE is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Cboe Nasdaq-100 BuyWrite. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, E61Z.DE returned 14.61%/yr vs 12.74%/yr for QYLE.DE. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. E61Z.DE charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for QYLE.DE.
Performance
E61Z.DE vs. QYLE.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, E61Z.DE achieves a -14.62% return, which is significantly lower than QYLE.DE's 6.53% return.
E61Z.DE
- 1D
- 1.36%
- 1M
- -0.83%
- YTD
- -14.62%
- 6M
- -14.70%
- 1Y
- -10.48%
- 3Y*
- 14.61%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QYLE.DE
- 1D
- -1.00%
- 1M
- 2.58%
- YTD
- 6.53%
- 6M
- 7.45%
- 1Y
- 16.40%
- 3Y*
- 12.74%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
E61Z.DE vs. QYLE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
E61Z.DE Global X E-commerce UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | -14.62% | 7.18% | 37.44% | 27.85% | -3.61% |
QYLE.DE Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF D | 6.53% | -7.62% | 37.36% | 30.02% | -5.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between E61Z.DE and QYLE.DE is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2022 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
E61Z.DE vs. QYLE.DE — Risk / Return Rank
E61Z.DE
QYLE.DE
E61Z.DE vs. QYLE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X E-commerce UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (E61Z.DE) and Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF D (QYLE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| E61Z.DE | QYLE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.30 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.38 | 3.87 | -4.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.76 | 10.46 | -11.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| E61Z.DE | QYLE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.50 | 1.68 | -2.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.11 | 1.16 | -1.27 |
Drawdowns
E61Z.DE vs. QYLE.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum E61Z.DE drawdown since its inception was -49.16%, which is greater than QYLE.DE's maximum drawdown of -24.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for E61Z.DE and QYLE.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| E61Z.DE | QYLE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.16% | -24.06% | -25.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.19% | -4.17% | -21.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.13% | -24.06% | -6.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.27% | -5.04% | -16.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.70% | -5.68% | -20.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.75% | 1.55% | +11.20% |
Volatility
E61Z.DE vs. QYLE.DE - Volatility Comparison
Global X E-commerce UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (E61Z.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.55% compared to Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF D (QYLE.DE) at 2.32%. This indicates that E61Z.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| E61Z.DE | QYLE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.55% | 2.32% | +2.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.51% | 6.14% | +8.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.25% | 9.63% | +9.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.20% | 13.25% | +13.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.20% | 13.25% | +13.95% |
E61Z.DE vs. QYLE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
E61Z.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLE.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
E61Z.DE vs. QYLE.DE - Dividend Comparison
E61Z.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QYLE.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.84%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
E61Z.DE Global X E-commerce UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QYLE.DE Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF D | 8.84% | 10.67% | 15.00% | 20.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
E61Z.DE and QYLE.DE have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QYLE.DE is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QYLE.DE is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for E61Z.DE.
E61Z.DE is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while QYLE.DE is Nasdaq-100. E61Z.DE tracks Solactive E-commerce, while QYLE.DE tracks Cboe Nasdaq-100 BuyWrite. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for E61Z.DE and 0.45% for QYLE.DE.
Find the right allocation for E61Z.DE and QYLE.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer