E vs. XLK
E (Eni S.p.A.) is a stock, while XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Over the past 10 years, E returned 12.10%/yr vs 25.62%/yr for XLK. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
E vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, E achieves a 46.72% return, which is significantly higher than XLK's 34.34% return. Over the past 10 years, E has underperformed XLK with an annualized return of 12.10%, while XLK has yielded a comparatively higher 25.62% annualized return.
E
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -2.61%
- YTD
- 46.72%
- 6M
- 46.22%
- 1Y
- 91.07%
- 3Y*
- 32.91%
- 5Y*
- 24.45%
- 10Y*
- 12.10%
XLK
- 1D
- -1.56%
- 1M
- 16.63%
- YTD
- 34.34%
- 6M
- 33.10%
- 1Y
- 64.08%
- 3Y*
- 33.46%
- 5Y*
- 23.44%
- 10Y*
- 25.62%
E vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
E Eni S.p.A. | 46.72% | 48.40% | -13.95% | 26.73% | 10.92% | 43.12% | -28.73% | 4.29% | -0.98% | 7.27% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 34.34% | 24.61% | 21.63% | 56.02% | -27.73% | 34.74% | 43.62% | 49.86% | -1.68% | 34.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between E and XLK is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 1998 | 0.35 |
The correlation between E and XLK shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.35 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
E vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank
E
XLK
E vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eni S.p.A. (E) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| E | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.64 | 1.49 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.84 | 4.04 | +5.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 33.57 | 13.55 | +20.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| E | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.04 | 3.09 | +0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 | 0.95 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 1.05 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.41 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
E vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum E drawdown since its inception was -70.53%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for E and XLK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| E | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.53% | -82.05% | +11.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.30% | -15.92% | +6.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.13% | -25.66% | +5.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.71% | -33.56% | -0.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.59% | -33.56% | -28.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.49% | -2.54% | -1.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.08% | -34.95% | +11.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.72% | 4.74% | -2.02% |
Volatility
E vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
Eni S.p.A. (E) has a higher volatility of 8.74% compared to State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) at 7.27%. This indicates that E's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| E | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.74% | 7.27% | +1.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.59% | 16.76% | +2.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.67% | 20.86% | +1.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.03% | 24.90% | +0.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.34% | 24.49% | +3.85% |
Dividends
E vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
E's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, more than XLK's 0.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
E Eni S.p.A. | 4.43% | 5.88% | 7.69% | 5.74% | 6.38% | 5.79% | 5.91% | 6.11% | 5.15% | 3.96% | 3.98% | 5.14% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.40% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
E and XLK have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
E has higher volatility (8.74%) compared to XLK (7.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, E dropped -70.53% vs XLK's -82.05%.
E currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.04 vs 3.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for E and XLK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer