DZZ vs. USSG
DZZ (DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes) and USSG (Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DZZ is a Leveraged Commodities fund tracking the Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index-Optimum Yield Gold (-200%), while USSG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA ESG Leaders. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DZZ returned -8.56%/yr vs 13.10%/yr for USSG. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. DZZ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for USSG.
Performance
DZZ vs. USSG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DZZ achieves a -52.47% return, which is significantly lower than USSG's 7.41% return.
DZZ
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -12.68%
- YTD
- -52.47%
- 6M
- -48.59%
- 1Y
- -5.68%
- 3Y*
- -10.43%
- 5Y*
- -8.56%
- 10Y*
- -10.01%
USSG
- 1D
- -1.38%
- 1M
- -1.40%
- YTD
- 7.41%
- 6M
- 6.03%
- 1Y
- 24.41%
- 3Y*
- 21.01%
- 5Y*
- 13.10%
- 10Y*
- —
DZZ vs. USSG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DZZ DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes | -52.47% | 132.78% | -35.06% | -8.14% | 2.79% | 0.56% | -37.13% | -26.76% |
USSG Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF | 7.41% | 18.97% | 23.45% | 29.17% | -20.33% | 31.83% | 18.71% | 19.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between DZZ and USSG is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2019 | -0.04 |
The correlation between DZZ and USSG shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to -0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DZZ vs. USSG — Risk / Return Rank
DZZ
USSG
DZZ vs. USSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes (DZZ) and Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF (USSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DZZ | USSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.32 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.07 | 2.19 | -2.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.10 | 9.23 | -9.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DZZ vs. USSG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DZZ drawdown since its inception was -96.64%, which is greater than USSG's maximum drawdown of -34.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DZZ and USSG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DZZ | USSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.64% | -34.10% | -62.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -81.05% | -11.20% | -69.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -81.05% | -20.00% | -61.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -81.05% | -27.00% | -54.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -81.05% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.55% | -3.10% | -92.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.32% | -5.57% | -76.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 56.22% | 2.65% | +53.57% |
Volatility
DZZ vs. USSG - Volatility Comparison
DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes (DZZ) has a higher volatility of 15.04% compared to Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF (USSG) at 5.30%. This indicates that DZZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DZZ | USSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.04% | 5.30% | +9.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 60.07% | 10.95% | +49.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 169.84% | 13.73% | +156.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 83.80% | 17.70% | +66.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 64.06% | 20.17% | +43.89% |
DZZ vs. USSG - Expense Ratio Comparison
DZZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than USSG's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
DZZ vs. USSG - Dividend Comparison
DZZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while USSG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DZZ DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USSG Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF | 1.01% | 1.02% | 1.13% | 1.60% | 1.52% | 1.13% | 1.42% | 1.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DZZ and USSG have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DZZ has higher volatility (15.04%) compared to USSG (5.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DZZ dropped -96.64% vs USSG's -34.10%.
On 5-year performance, USSG leads with 13.10% vs -8.56% for DZZ. On fees, USSG is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, USSG has been the lower-risk option at 5.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, USSG has performed better with a 13.10% return vs -8.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USSG is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for DZZ.
USSG has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.00% for DZZ.
DZZ is categorized as Leveraged Commodities, while USSG is Large Cap Growth Equities. DZZ tracks Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index-Optimum Yield Gold (-200%), while USSG tracks MSCI USA ESG Leaders. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for DZZ and 0.10% for USSG.
USSG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DZZ and USSG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer