DZZ vs. SLVR
DZZ (DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes) and SLVR (Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DZZ is a Leveraged Commodities fund tracking the Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index-Optimum Yield Gold (-200%), while SLVR is a Silver fund tracking the Nasdaq Sprott Silver Miners™ Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, DZZ returned 11.20% vs 118.11% for SLVR. At a correlation of -0.40, they often move in opposite directions. DZZ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for SLVR.
Performance
DZZ vs. SLVR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DZZ achieves a -48.31% return, which is significantly lower than SLVR's 6.80% return.
DZZ
- 1D
- 1.45%
- 1M
- -16.65%
- YTD
- -48.31%
- 6M
- -41.62%
- 1Y
- 11.20%
- 3Y*
- -6.90%
- 5Y*
- -4.82%
- 10Y*
- -10.52%
SLVR
- 1D
- -5.47%
- 1M
- 1.96%
- YTD
- 6.80%
- 6M
- 18.93%
- 1Y
- 118.11%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DZZ vs. SLVR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DZZ DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes | -48.31% | 143.04% |
SLVR Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF | 6.80% | 170.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between DZZ and SLVR is -0.41, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2025 | -0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DZZ vs. SLVR — Risk / Return Rank
DZZ
SLVR
DZZ vs. SLVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes (DZZ) and Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF (SLVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DZZ | SLVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.31 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.14 | 3.08 | -2.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.21 | 7.66 | -7.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DZZ | SLVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 | 1.93 | -1.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.06 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.16 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.23 | 2.02 | -2.25 |
Drawdowns
DZZ vs. SLVR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DZZ drawdown since its inception was -96.64%, which is greater than SLVR's maximum drawdown of -38.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DZZ and SLVR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DZZ | SLVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.64% | -38.60% | -58.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -80.84% | -38.60% | -42.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -80.84% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -80.84% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.16% | -28.51% | -66.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.30% | -9.24% | -73.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 53.19% | 15.47% | +37.72% |
Volatility
DZZ vs. SLVR - Volatility Comparison
DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes (DZZ) has a higher volatility of 30.21% compared to Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF (SLVR) at 19.31%. This indicates that DZZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DZZ | SLVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 30.21% | 19.31% | +10.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 59.65% | 51.02% | +8.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 169.45% | 61.64% | +107.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 83.63% | 57.85% | +25.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 64.05% | 57.85% | +6.20% |
DZZ vs. SLVR - Expense Ratio Comparison
DZZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SLVR's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
DZZ vs. SLVR - Dividend Comparison
DZZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SLVR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.45%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
DZZ DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SLVR Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF | 3.45% | 3.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DZZ and SLVR have a correlation of -0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DZZ has higher volatility (30.21%) compared to SLVR (19.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DZZ dropped -96.64% vs SLVR's -38.60%.
On 1-year performance, SLVR leads with 118.11% vs 11.20% for DZZ. On fees, SLVR is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, SLVR has been the lower-risk option at 19.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SLVR has performed better with a 118.11% return vs 11.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SLVR is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for DZZ.
SLVR has the higher dividend yield at 3.45%, compared with 0.00% for DZZ.
DZZ is categorized as Leveraged Commodities, while SLVR is Silver. DZZ tracks Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index-Optimum Yield Gold (-200%), while SLVR tracks Nasdaq Sprott Silver Miners™ Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and Sprott. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for DZZ and 0.65% for SLVR.
SLVR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DZZ and SLVR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer