DYNF vs. SGRT
DYNF (BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF) and SGRT (SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DYNF charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for SGRT.
Performance
DYNF vs. SGRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DYNF achieves a 11.93% return, which is significantly lower than SGRT's 48.90% return.
DYNF
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 5.19%
- YTD
- 11.93%
- 6M
- 11.85%
- 1Y
- 30.76%
- 3Y*
- 26.47%
- 5Y*
- 15.11%
- 10Y*
- —
SGRT
- 1D
- -1.69%
- 1M
- 9.59%
- YTD
- 48.90%
- 6M
- 51.74%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DYNF vs. SGRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DYNF BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF | 11.93% | 8.13% |
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF | 48.90% | 25.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between DYNF and SGRT is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2025 | 0.76 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DYNF vs. SGRT — Risk / Return Rank
DYNF
SGRT
DYNF vs. SGRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF (DYNF) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DYNF | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.57 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.29 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DYNF | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 3.63 | -2.80 |
Drawdowns
DYNF vs. SGRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DYNF drawdown since its inception was -34.72%, which is greater than SGRT's maximum drawdown of -17.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DYNF and SGRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DYNF | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.72% | -17.87% | -16.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.67% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.24% | -1.69% | +1.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.97% | -3.10% | -2.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.78% | — | — |
Volatility
DYNF vs. SGRT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DYNF | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.21% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.55% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.44% | 33.40% | -20.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.49% | 33.40% | -15.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.90% | 33.40% | -13.50% |
DYNF vs. SGRT - Expense Ratio Comparison
DYNF has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than SGRT's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
DYNF vs. SGRT - Dividend Comparison
DYNF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, more than SGRT's 0.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DYNF BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF | 0.88% | 1.01% | 0.65% | 1.11% | 1.66% | 2.89% | 1.52% | 1.22% |
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF | 0.11% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DYNF and SGRT have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DYNF is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DYNF is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for SGRT.
DYNF has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.11% for SGRT.
Their fees differ too: 0.30% for DYNF and 0.59% for SGRT.
Find the right allocation for DYNF and SGRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer