DYNF vs. IUS

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

DYNF (iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF) and IUS (Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. DYNF is actively managed, while IUS is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DYNF returned 14.71%/yr vs 13.73%/yr for IUS. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DYNF charges 0.26%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for IUS.

Performance

DYNF vs. IUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF (DYNF) and Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF (IUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DYNF achieves a 10.04% return, which is significantly lower than IUS's 14.43% return.

DYNF

• 1D: -1.62%
• 1M: 0.13%
• YTD: 10.04%
• 6M: 8.91%
• 1Y: 27.42%
• 3Y*: 25.19%
• 5Y*: 14.71%
• 10Y*: —

IUS

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 0.18%
• YTD: 14.43%
• 6M: 13.98%
• 1Y: 30.78%
• 3Y*: 19.91%
• 5Y*: 13.73%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DYNF vs. IUS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
DYNF iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF	10.04%	20.00%	30.29%	36.25%	-20.27%	22.12%	13.47%	14.75%
IUS Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF	14.43%	16.94%	16.51%	20.79%	-8.34%	32.17%	15.09%	17.35%

Correlation

The correlation between DYNF and IUS is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2019	0.88

The correlation between DYNF and IUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

DYNF vs. IUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DYNF	IUS
Technology	40.5%	26.7%
Financial Services	14.9%	6.8%
Communication Services	10.3%	13.0%
Industrials	9.5%	9.7%
Consumer Cyclical	7.0%	10.4%
Healthcare	5.8%	12.6%
Energy	4.5%	9.4%
Utilities	2.8%	1.0%
Real Estate	1.9%	0.4%
Consumer Defensive	1.7%	6.9%
Basic Materials	0.8%	3.2%

Return for Risk

DYNF vs. IUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DYNF

DYNF Risk / Return Rank: 68
DYNF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
DYNF Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
DYNF Omega Ratio Rank: 65
DYNF Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
DYNF Martin Ratio Rank: 79

IUS

IUS Risk / Return Rank: 90
IUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
IUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
IUS Omega Ratio Rank: 88
IUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
IUS Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DYNF vs. IUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF (DYNF) and Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF (IUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DYNF	IUS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.09	2.89	-0.81
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.82	3.95	-1.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.53	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.18	5.03	-1.85
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.86	20.93	-6.07

DYNF vs. IUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DYNF Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the IUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DYNF and IUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DYNF vs. IUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DYNF drawdown since its inception was -34.72%, roughly equal to the maximum IUS drawdown of -34.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DYNF and IUS.

Drawdown Indicators

	DYNF	IUS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.72%	-34.67%	-0.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.67%	-6.15%	-2.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.70%	-15.61%	-3.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.65%	-18.72%	-9.93%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.97%	-1.76%	-0.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.94%	-3.85%	-2.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.85%	1.47%	+0.38%

Volatility

DYNF vs. IUS - Volatility Comparison

iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF (DYNF) has a higher volatility of 5.38% compared to Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF (IUS) at 3.84%. This indicates that DYNF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DYNF	IUS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.38%	3.84%	+1.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.64%	8.03%	+2.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.24%	10.69%	+2.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.62%	15.03%	+2.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.91%	18.02%	+1.89%

DYNF vs. IUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DYNF has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is higher than IUS's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

DYNF vs. IUS - Dividend Comparison

DYNF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, less than IUS's 1.30% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
DYNF iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF	0.81%	1.01%	0.65%	1.11%	1.66%	2.89%	1.52%	1.22%	0.00%
IUS Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF	1.30%	1.48%	1.52%	1.72%	1.78%	1.46%	1.74%	1.77%	0.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DYNF and IUS in my portfolio?

DYNF and IUS have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DYNF or IUS?

DYNF has higher volatility (5.38%) compared to IUS (3.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DYNF dropped -34.72% vs IUS's -34.67%.

Which ETF is better, DYNF or IUS?

On 5-year performance, DYNF leads with 14.71% vs 13.73% for IUS. On fees, IUS is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, IUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DYNF or IUS?

Over the 5-year period, DYNF has performed better with a 14.71% return vs 13.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DYNF or IUS?

IUS is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.26% for DYNF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DYNF or IUS?

IUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.30%, compared with 0.81% for DYNF.

What is the main difference between DYNF and IUS?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for DYNF and 0.19% for IUS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.89 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.