DYNF vs. GARP
DYNF (iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF) and GARP (iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DYNF is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by iShares, while GARP is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index. DYNF is actively managed, while GARP is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DYNF returned 14.62%/yr vs 18.96%/yr for GARP. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DYNF charges 0.26%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for GARP.
Performance
DYNF vs. GARP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DYNF achieves a 9.88% return, which is significantly lower than GARP's 16.96% return.
DYNF
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 0.54%
- YTD
- 9.88%
- 6M
- 10.36%
- 1Y
- 28.69%
- 3Y*
- 24.87%
- 5Y*
- 14.62%
- 10Y*
- —
GARP
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 3.69%
- YTD
- 16.96%
- 6M
- 17.70%
- 1Y
- 38.39%
- 3Y*
- 31.05%
- 5Y*
- 18.96%
- 10Y*
- —
DYNF vs. GARP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DYNF iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF | 9.88% | 20.00% | 30.29% | 36.25% | -20.27% | 22.12% | 11.85% |
GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF | 16.96% | 21.49% | 37.42% | 42.86% | -26.75% | 27.99% | 26.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between DYNF and GARP is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2020 | 0.88 |
The correlation between DYNF and GARP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
DYNF vs. GARP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DYNF
GARP
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
Technology
DYNF
GARP
Financial Services
DYNF
GARP
Communication Services
DYNF
GARP
Industrials
DYNF
GARP
Consumer Cyclical
DYNF
GARP
Healthcare
DYNF
GARP
Energy
DYNF
GARP
Utilities
DYNF
GARP
Real Estate
DYNF
GARP
Consumer Defensive
DYNF
GARP
-
Basic Materials
DYNF
GARP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DYNF vs. GARP — Risk / Return Rank
DYNF
GARP
DYNF vs. GARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF (DYNF) and iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DYNF | GARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.33 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.15 | 2.65 | +0.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.77 | 10.37 | +4.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DYNF vs. GARP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DYNF drawdown since its inception was -34.72%, which is greater than GARP's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DYNF and GARP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DYNF | GARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.72% | -31.34% | -3.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.67% | -13.69% | +5.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.70% | -23.73% | +5.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.65% | -30.61% | +1.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.06% | -4.27% | +2.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.96% | -7.35% | +1.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.85% | 3.49% | -1.64% |
Volatility
DYNF vs. GARP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF (DYNF) is 4.91%, while iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) has a volatility of 7.61%. This indicates that DYNF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DYNF | GARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.91% | 7.61% | -2.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.37% | 15.12% | -4.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.01% | 18.79% | -5.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.58% | 22.11% | -4.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.91% | 23.95% | -4.04% |
DYNF vs. GARP - Expense Ratio Comparison
DYNF has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is higher than GARP's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DYNF vs. GARP - Dividend Comparison
DYNF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, more than GARP's 0.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DYNF iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF | 0.90% | 1.01% | 0.65% | 1.11% | 1.66% | 2.89% | 1.52% | 1.22% |
GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF | 0.26% | 0.31% | 0.38% | 0.75% | 1.85% | 0.67% | 0.75% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, DYNF and GARP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
GARP has higher volatility (7.61%) compared to DYNF (4.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DYNF dropped -34.72% vs GARP's -31.34%.
On 5-year performance, GARP leads with 18.96% vs 14.62% for DYNF. On fees, GARP is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, DYNF has been the lower-risk option at 4.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GARP has performed better with a 18.96% return vs 14.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GARP is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.26% for DYNF.
DYNF has the higher dividend yield at 0.90%, compared with 0.26% for GARP.
DYNF is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while GARP is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for DYNF and 0.15% for GARP.
DYNF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DYNF and GARP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer