PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DYNF vs. DGRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DYNF vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF (DYNF) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DYNF having a 11.67% return and DGRO slightly higher at 12.23%.


DYNF

1D
-0.79%
1M
1.63%
6M
10.13%
YTD
11.67%
1Y
24.38%
3Y*
23.81%
5Y*
14.86%
10Y*

DGRO

1D
0.19%
1M
2.16%
6M
9.63%
YTD
12.23%
1Y
21.63%
3Y*
16.92%
5Y*
11.06%
10Y*
13.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DYNF vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
DYNF
iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF
11.67%20.00%30.29%36.25%-20.27%22.12%13.47%14.75%
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
12.23%15.69%16.62%10.47%-7.91%26.64%9.50%17.42%

Correlation

The correlation between DYNF and DGRO is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2019

0.83

Over the past year, the correlation between DYNF and DGRO has dropped to 0.54 - well below their long-term average of 0.83, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

DYNF vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DYNF
DGRO

Technology

40.0%
22.0%

Financial Services

15.3%
20.6%

Communication Services

9.8%
0.1%

Industrials

9.5%
10.4%

Consumer Cyclical

7.1%
5.4%

Healthcare

6.3%
16.5%

Energy

4.4%
5.1%

Utilities

2.9%
6.4%

Real Estate

2.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

1.6%
11.1%

Basic Materials

0.7%
2.4%

Technology

DYNF
40.0%
DGRO
22.0%

Financial Services

DYNF
15.3%
DGRO
20.6%

Communication Services

DYNF
9.8%
DGRO
0.1%

Industrials

DYNF
9.5%
DGRO
10.4%

Consumer Cyclical

DYNF
7.1%
DGRO
5.4%

Healthcare

DYNF
6.3%
DGRO
16.5%

Energy

DYNF
4.4%
DGRO
5.1%

Utilities

DYNF
2.9%
DGRO
6.4%

Real Estate

DYNF
2.0%
DGRO

-

Consumer Defensive

DYNF
1.6%
DGRO
11.1%

Basic Materials

DYNF
0.7%
DGRO
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DYNF vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DYNF
DYNF Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
DYNF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DYNF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
DYNF Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
DYNF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
DYNF Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRO
DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DYNF vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF (DYNF) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DYNFDGRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.42

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.83

3.36

-0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.08

12.98

+0.09

DYNF vs. DGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DYNF Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the DGRO Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DYNF and DGRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DYNF vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DYNF drawdown since its inception was -34.72%, roughly equal to the maximum DGRO drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DYNF and DGRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DYNFDGRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.72%

-35.10%

+0.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.67%

-6.47%

-2.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.70%

-14.03%

-4.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.65%

-19.31%

-9.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.79%

-0.50%

-0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.91%

-3.42%

-2.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.87%

1.67%

+0.20%

Volatility

DYNF vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison

iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF (DYNF) has a higher volatility of 4.82% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 2.52%. This indicates that DYNF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DYNFDGRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.82%

2.52%

+2.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.91%

6.94%

+3.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.41%

9.50%

+3.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.63%

13.79%

+3.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.88%

16.57%

+3.31%

DYNF vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

DYNF has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DYNF vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison

DYNF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than DGRO's 1.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
1.91%2.09%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%
DYNF
iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF
0.80%1.01%0.65%1.11%1.66%2.89%1.52%1.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DYNF and DGRO have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DYNF has higher volatility (4.82%) compared to DGRO (2.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DYNF dropped -34.72% vs DGRO's -35.10%.

On 5-year performance, DYNF leads with 14.86% vs 11.06% for DGRO. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DYNF has performed better with a 14.86% return vs 11.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.26% for DYNF.

DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.91%, compared with 0.80% for DYNF.

DYNF is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for DYNF and 0.08% for DGRO.

DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DYNF and DGRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer