DYNB vs. SOFR

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

DYNB (Hartford Dynamic Bond ETF) and SOFR (Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. DYNB is actively managed, while SOFR is passively managed. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DYNB charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SOFR.

Performance

DYNB vs. SOFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Dynamic Bond ETF (DYNB) and Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF (SOFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DYNB achieves a 0.38% return, which is significantly lower than SOFR's 1.70% return.

DYNB

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 0.55%
• YTD: 0.38%
• 6M: 0.52%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SOFR

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 0.29%
• YTD: 1.70%
• 6M: 1.82%
• 1Y: 3.93%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DYNB vs. SOFR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DYNB Hartford Dynamic Bond ETF	0.38%	0.42%
SOFR Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF	1.70%	1.11%

Correlation

The correlation between DYNB and SOFR is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025	0.05

Return for Risk

DYNB vs. SOFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DYNB

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SOFR

SOFR Risk / Return Rank: 98
SOFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
SOFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
SOFR Omega Ratio Rank: 99
SOFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
SOFR Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DYNB vs. SOFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Dynamic Bond ETF (DYNB) and Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF (SOFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DYNB	SOFR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	4.71	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	6.93	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	3.44	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	9.72	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	39.74	—

Drawdowns

DYNB vs. SOFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DYNB drawdown since its inception was -2.61%, which is greater than SOFR's maximum drawdown of -0.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DYNB and SOFR.

Drawdown Indicators

	DYNB	SOFR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.61%	-0.41%	-2.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.41%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.95%	0.00%	-0.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.65%	-0.03%	-0.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.10%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DYNB	SOFR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.25%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.56%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.95%	0.84%	+2.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.95%	0.83%	+2.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.95%	0.83%	+2.12%

DYNB vs. SOFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

DYNB has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SOFR's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

DYNB vs. SOFR - Dividend Comparison

DYNB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%, less than SOFR's 3.94% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
DYNB Hartford Dynamic Bond ETF	2.64%	1.03%	0.00%
SOFR Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF	3.94%	4.22%	1.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DYNB and SOFR in my portfolio?

DYNB and SOFR have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DYNB or SOFR?

On fees, SOFR is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DYNB or SOFR?

SOFR is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DYNB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DYNB or SOFR?

SOFR has the higher dividend yield at 3.94%, compared with 2.64% for DYNB.

What is the main difference between DYNB and SOFR?

They also come from different issuers: Hartford Funds and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DYNB and 0.20% for SOFR.