PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DYLG vs. EDOW
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DYLG vs. EDOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF (DYLG) and First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF (EDOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DYLG vs. EDOW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
DYLG
Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF
-2.73%12.50%14.46%4.05%
EDOW
First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF
-1.60%15.46%13.17%6.59%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DYLG achieves a -2.73% return, which is significantly lower than EDOW's -1.60% return.


DYLG

1D
0.45%
1M
-4.68%
YTD
-2.73%
6M
1.96%
1Y
9.56%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EDOW

1D
-0.15%
1M
-5.36%
YTD
-1.60%
6M
1.77%
1Y
13.59%
3Y*
12.94%
5Y*
8.25%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DYLG vs. EDOW - Expense Ratio Comparison

DYLG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than EDOW's 0.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

DYLG vs. EDOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DYLG
DYLG Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
DYLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DYLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
DYLG Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
DYLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
DYLG Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

EDOW
EDOW Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
EDOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDOW Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
EDOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDOW Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DYLG vs. EDOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF (DYLG) and First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF (EDOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DYLGEDOWDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.66

0.87

-0.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.05

1.34

-0.30

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.19

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.94

1.18

-0.24

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.91

4.94

-1.03

DYLG vs. EDOW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DYLG Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is comparable to the EDOW Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DYLG and EDOW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DYLGEDOWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

0.87

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

0.59

+0.31

Correlation

The correlation between DYLG and EDOW is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

DYLG vs. EDOW - Dividend Comparison

DYLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.28%, more than EDOW's 1.33% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DYLG
Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF
10.28%9.63%16.55%1.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EDOW
First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF
1.33%1.31%1.65%1.93%1.91%1.52%1.84%1.88%1.82%0.75%

Drawdowns

DYLG vs. EDOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DYLG drawdown since its inception was -13.98%, smaller than the maximum EDOW drawdown of -33.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DYLG and EDOW.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DYLGEDOWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.98%

-33.72%

+19.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.25%

-11.30%

+1.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.86%

-6.94%

+1.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.86%

-4.11%

+2.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.46%

2.70%

-0.24%

Volatility

DYLG vs. EDOW - Volatility Comparison

Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF (DYLG) has a higher volatility of 4.40% compared to First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF (EDOW) at 4.18%. This indicates that DYLG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EDOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DYLGEDOWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.40%

4.18%

+0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.32%

8.01%

-0.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.58%

15.72%

-1.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.55%

14.20%

-2.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.55%

17.85%

-6.30%