DYLD vs. VGMS
DYLD (LeaderShares Dynamic Yield ETF) and VGMS (Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DYLD charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for VGMS.
Performance
DYLD vs. VGMS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DYLD achieves a 1.00% return, which is significantly lower than VGMS's 1.06% return.
DYLD
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 1.00%
- 6M
- 1.18%
- 1Y
- 4.12%
- 3Y*
- 4.47%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VGMS
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 1.06%
- 6M
- 1.35%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DYLD vs. VGMS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DYLD LeaderShares Dynamic Yield ETF | 1.00% | 2.93% |
VGMS Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond ETF | 1.06% | 5.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between DYLD and VGMS is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2025 | 0.63 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DYLD vs. VGMS — Risk / Return Rank
DYLD
VGMS
DYLD vs. VGMS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LeaderShares Dynamic Yield ETF (DYLD) and Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond ETF (VGMS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DYLD | VGMS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.12 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.42 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DYLD | VGMS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 2.11 | -1.85 |
Drawdowns
DYLD vs. VGMS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DYLD drawdown since its inception was -15.03%, which is greater than VGMS's maximum drawdown of -2.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DYLD and VGMS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DYLD | VGMS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.03% | -2.46% | -12.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.32% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.40% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.11% | -0.39% | +0.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.18% | -0.31% | -4.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.36% | — | — |
Volatility
DYLD vs. VGMS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DYLD | VGMS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.60% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.99% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.47% | 3.21% | -0.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.39% | 3.21% | +1.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.39% | 3.21% | +1.18% |
DYLD vs. VGMS - Expense Ratio Comparison
DYLD has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than VGMS's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
DYLD vs. VGMS - Dividend Comparison
DYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.33%, less than VGMS's 5.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DYLD LeaderShares Dynamic Yield ETF | 4.33% | 4.20% | 4.58% | 3.43% | 1.54% | 1.02% |
VGMS Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond ETF | 5.16% | 2.94% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DYLD and VGMS have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VGMS is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VGMS is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for DYLD.
VGMS has the higher dividend yield at 5.16%, compared with 4.33% for DYLD.
They also come from different issuers: LeaderShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for DYLD and 0.30% for VGMS.
Find the right allocation for DYLD and VGMS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer