JOJO vs. CMF

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

JOJO (ATAC Credit Rotation ETF) and CMF (iShares California Muni Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JOJO is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by ATAC, while CMF is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the S&P California AMT-Free Municipal Bond Index. JOJO is actively managed, while CMF is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, JOJO returned 6.82%/yr vs 3.14%/yr for CMF. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JOJO charges 1.28%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for CMF.

Performance

JOJO vs. CMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ATAC Credit Rotation ETF (JOJO) and iShares California Muni Bond ETF (CMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JOJO achieves a 2.09% return, which is significantly higher than CMF's 1.28% return.

JOJO

• 1D: -0.65%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 2.09%
• 6M: 2.35%
• 1Y: 8.83%
• 3Y*: 6.82%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CMF

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 1.39%
• YTD: 1.28%
• 6M: 1.51%
• 1Y: 6.61%
• 3Y*: 3.14%
• 5Y*: 0.75%
• 10Y*: 1.66%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JOJO vs. CMF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
JOJO ATAC Credit Rotation ETF	2.09%	10.52%	2.74%	7.61%	-22.01%	-0.60%
CMF iShares California Muni Bond ETF	1.28%	3.36%	1.65%	5.71%	-8.27%	-0.05%

Correlation

The correlation between JOJO and CMF is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.55
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2021	0.55

The correlation between JOJO and CMF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

JOJO vs. CMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JOJO

JOJO Risk / Return Rank: 38
JOJO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
JOJO Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
JOJO Omega Ratio Rank: 39
JOJO Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
JOJO Martin Ratio Rank: 34

CMF

CMF Risk / Return Rank: 68
CMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
CMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
CMF Omega Ratio Rank: 89
CMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
CMF Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JOJO vs. CMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ATAC Credit Rotation ETF (JOJO) and iShares California Muni Bond ETF (CMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JOJO	CMF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.31	2.40	-1.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.01	3.44	-1.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.54	-0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.80	2.28	-0.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.93	7.50	-2.57

JOJO vs. CMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JOJO Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is lower than the CMF Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JOJO and CMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JOJO vs. CMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JOJO drawdown since its inception was -28.43%, which is greater than CMF's maximum drawdown of -16.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JOJO and CMF.

Drawdown Indicators

	JOJO	CMF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.43%	-16.45%	-11.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.93%	-2.91%	-2.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.43%	-5.22%	-4.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-12.45%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-14.57%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.08%	-0.61%	-5.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.71%	-4.76%	-10.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.80%	0.88%	+0.92%

Volatility

JOJO vs. CMF - Volatility Comparison

ATAC Credit Rotation ETF (JOJO) has a higher volatility of 1.79% compared to iShares California Muni Bond ETF (CMF) at 0.71%. This indicates that JOJO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JOJO	CMF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.79%	0.71%	+1.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.09%	2.17%	+2.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.80%	2.77%	+4.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.27%	4.19%	+7.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.27%	5.08%	+6.19%

JOJO vs. CMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

JOJO has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than CMF's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

JOJO vs. CMF - Dividend Comparison

JOJO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.14%, more than CMF's 2.94% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CMF iShares California Muni Bond ETF	2.94%	2.94%	2.78%	2.29%	1.91%	1.58%	1.80%	2.03%	2.17%	2.09%	2.21%	2.55%
JOJO ATAC Credit Rotation ETF	5.14%	4.78%	4.88%	4.30%	3.63%	2.53%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JOJO and CMF in my portfolio?

JOJO and CMF have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JOJO or CMF?

JOJO has higher volatility (1.79%) compared to CMF (0.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JOJO dropped -28.43% vs CMF's -16.45%.

Which ETF is better, JOJO or CMF?

On 3-year performance, JOJO leads with 6.82% vs 3.14% for CMF. On fees, CMF is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, CMF has been the lower-risk option at 0.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JOJO or CMF?

Over the 3-year period, JOJO has performed better with a 6.82% return vs 3.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JOJO or CMF?

CMF is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.28% for JOJO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JOJO or CMF?

JOJO has the higher dividend yield at 5.14%, compared with 2.94% for CMF.

What is the main difference between JOJO and CMF?

JOJO is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while CMF is Municipal Bonds. They also come from different issuers: ATAC and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.28% for JOJO and 0.25% for CMF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.