DYFI vs. LNGX
DYFI (IDX Dynamic Fixed Income ETF) and LNGX (Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DYFI is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by IDX, while LNGX is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Global X U.S. Natural Gas Index. DYFI is actively managed, while LNGX is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.34, they often move in opposite directions. DYFI charges 1.33%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for LNGX.
Performance
DYFI vs. LNGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DYFI achieves a -0.02% return, which is significantly lower than LNGX's 20.47% return.
DYFI
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- -0.02%
- 6M
- 0.42%
- 1Y
- 4.23%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LNGX
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -6.84%
- YTD
- 20.47%
- 6M
- 13.78%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DYFI vs. LNGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DYFI IDX Dynamic Fixed Income ETF | -0.02% | 0.65% |
LNGX Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF | 20.47% | 5.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between DYFI and LNGX is -0.34, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2025 | -0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DYFI vs. LNGX — Risk / Return Rank
DYFI
LNGX
DYFI vs. LNGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IDX Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (DYFI) and Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF (LNGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DYFI | LNGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.72 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.39 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.72 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.05 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DYFI | LNGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.72 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 2.10 | -1.81 |
Drawdowns
DYFI vs. LNGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DYFI drawdown since its inception was -4.54%, smaller than the maximum LNGX drawdown of -14.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DYFI and LNGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DYFI | LNGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.54% | -14.31% | +9.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.49% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.97% | -11.36% | +10.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.41% | -4.37% | +2.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.71% | — | — |
Volatility
DYFI vs. LNGX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DYFI | LNGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.90% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.02% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.47% | 24.67% | -22.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.39% | 24.67% | -21.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.39% | 24.67% | -21.28% |
DYFI vs. LNGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DYFI has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is higher than LNGX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
DYFI vs. LNGX - Dividend Comparison
DYFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%, more than LNGX's 0.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
DYFI IDX Dynamic Fixed Income ETF | 4.62% | 4.63% | 5.93% |
LNGX Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF | 0.22% | 0.27% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DYFI and LNGX have a correlation of -0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LNGX is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LNGX is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.33% for DYFI.
DYFI has the higher dividend yield at 4.62%, compared with 0.22% for LNGX.
DYFI is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while LNGX is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: IDX and Global X. Their fees differ too: 1.33% for DYFI and 0.45% for LNGX.
Find the right allocation for DYFI and LNGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer