DYFI vs. CRDT
DYFI (IDX Dynamic Fixed Income ETF) and CRDT (Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DYFI returned 3.88% vs 3.19% for CRDT. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DYFI charges 1.33%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for CRDT.
Performance
DYFI vs. CRDT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DYFI achieves a -0.02% return, which is significantly lower than CRDT's 3.61% return.
DYFI
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- -0.02%
- 6M
- 0.40%
- 1Y
- 3.88%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRDT
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- 2.46%
- YTD
- 3.61%
- 6M
- 4.78%
- 1Y
- 3.19%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DYFI vs. CRDT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
DYFI IDX Dynamic Fixed Income ETF | -0.02% | 3.76% | -1.37% |
CRDT Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF | 3.61% | -0.67% | 5.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between DYFI and CRDT is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024 | 0.37 |
The correlation between DYFI and CRDT shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (all time) to 0.52 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DYFI vs. CRDT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DYFI
CRDT
Financial Services
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
DYFI
CRDT
Energy
DYFI
CRDT
-
Basic Materials
DYFI
-
CRDT
-
Communication Services
DYFI
-
CRDT
-
Consumer Cyclical
DYFI
-
CRDT
Consumer Defensive
DYFI
-
CRDT
-
Healthcare
DYFI
-
CRDT
-
Industrials
DYFI
-
CRDT
-
Real Estate
DYFI
-
CRDT
Technology
DYFI
-
CRDT
-
Utilities
DYFI
-
CRDT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DYFI vs. CRDT — Risk / Return Rank
DYFI
CRDT
DYFI vs. CRDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IDX Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (DYFI) and Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF (CRDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DYFI | CRDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.08 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.56 | 0.45 | +1.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.44 | 1.33 | +4.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DYFI | CRDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.58 | 0.36 | +1.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.64 | -0.36 |
Drawdowns
DYFI vs. CRDT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DYFI drawdown since its inception was -4.54%, smaller than the maximum CRDT drawdown of -9.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DYFI and CRDT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DYFI | CRDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.54% | -9.80% | +5.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.49% | -7.18% | +4.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.97% | -1.67% | +0.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.41% | -2.31% | +0.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.71% | 2.40% | -1.69% |
Volatility
DYFI vs. CRDT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for IDX Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (DYFI) is 0.87%, while Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF (CRDT) has a volatility of 3.86%. This indicates that DYFI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRDT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DYFI | CRDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.87% | 3.86% | -2.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.02% | 7.70% | -5.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.47% | 8.83% | -6.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.38% | 7.07% | -3.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.38% | 7.07% | -3.69% |
DYFI vs. CRDT - Expense Ratio Comparison
DYFI has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is higher than CRDT's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
DYFI vs. CRDT - Dividend Comparison
DYFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%, less than CRDT's 6.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CRDT Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF | 6.23% | 7.04% | 7.29% | 2.59% |
DYFI IDX Dynamic Fixed Income ETF | 4.62% | 4.63% | 5.93% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DYFI and CRDT have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRDT has higher volatility (3.86%) compared to DYFI (0.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DYFI dropped -4.54% vs CRDT's -9.80%.
On 1-year performance, DYFI leads with 3.88% vs 3.19% for CRDT. On fees, CRDT is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, DYFI has been the lower-risk option at 0.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DYFI has performed better with a 3.88% return vs 3.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CRDT is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.33% for DYFI.
CRDT has the higher dividend yield at 6.23%, compared with 4.62% for DYFI.
They also come from different issuers: IDX and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 1.33% for DYFI and 0.50% for CRDT.
DYFI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DYFI and CRDT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer