DY vs. VRT

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

DY (Dycom Industries, Inc.) and VRT (Vertiv Holdings Co.) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — DY in Engineering & Construction, VRT in Electrical Equipment & Parts. Over the past 5 years, DY returned 42.09%/yr vs 63.29%/yr for VRT. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

DY vs. VRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dycom Industries, Inc. (DY) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DY achieves a 38.80% return, which is significantly lower than VRT's 86.99% return.

DY

• 1D: 0.95%
• 1M: 7.23%
• YTD: 38.80%
• 6M: 35.64%
• 1Y: 101.16%
• 3Y*: 64.20%
• 5Y*: 42.09%
• 10Y*: 18.68%

VRT

• 1D: 1.68%
• 1M: -18.35%
• YTD: 86.99%
• 6M: 87.85%
• 1Y: 173.26%
• 3Y*: 138.33%
• 5Y*: 63.29%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DY vs. VRT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
DY Dycom Industries, Inc.	38.80%	94.13%	51.24%	22.96%	-0.17%	24.15%	60.17%	-12.75%	-39.91%
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co.	86.99%	42.80%	136.82%	251.81%	-45.25%	33.80%	69.36%	12.55%	1.03%

Correlation

The correlation between DY and VRT is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.45
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2018	0.38

The correlation between DY and VRT shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (all time) to 0.52 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap DY : $14.25B VRT : $118.76B
EPS DY : $10.52 VRT : $3.99
PE Ratio DY : 44.57 VRT : 75.98
PEG Ratio DY : 0.63 VRT : 0.33
PS Ratio DY : 2.22 VRT : 10.92
PB Ratio DY : 7.52 VRT : 27.98
Total Revenue (TTM) DY : $6.25B VRT : $10.84B
Gross Profit (TTM) DY : $1.23B VRT : $3.92B
EBITDA (TTM) DY : $1.07B VRT : $2.35B

Return for Risk

DY vs. VRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DY

DY Risk / Return Rank: 91
DY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
DY Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
DY Omega Ratio Rank: 89
DY Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
DY Martin Ratio Rank: 92

VRT

VRT Risk / Return Rank: 94
VRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
VRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
VRT Omega Ratio Rank: 91
VRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
VRT Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DY vs. VRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dycom Industries, Inc. (DY) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DY	VRT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.19	2.85	-0.66
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.18	3.34	-0.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.41	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.08	6.55	-2.47
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.38	17.79	-4.41

DY vs. VRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DY Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is comparable to the VRT Sharpe Ratio of 2.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DY and VRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DY vs. VRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DY drawdown since its inception was -93.54%, which is greater than VRT's maximum drawdown of -71.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DY and VRT.

Drawdown Indicators

	DY	VRT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.54%	-71.24%	-22.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.43%	-25.32%	+0.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.58%	-61.28%	+28.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.70%	-71.24%	+37.54%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-89.01%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.37%	-19.50%	+7.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-45.66%	-16.23%	-29.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.43%	9.30%	-1.87%

Volatility

DY vs. VRT - Volatility Comparison

Dycom Industries, Inc. (DY) has a higher volatility of 26.09% compared to Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) at 16.12%. This indicates that DY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DY	VRT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	26.09%	16.12%	+9.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	38.40%	45.82%	-7.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	45.60%	58.29%	-12.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.51%	61.88%	-18.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	52.93%	54.61%	-1.68%

Dividends

DY vs. VRT - Dividend Comparison

DY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
DY Dycom Industries, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co.	0.07%	0.11%	0.10%	0.05%	0.07%	0.04%	0.05%

Financials

DY vs. VRT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Dycom Industries, Inc. and Vertiv Holdings Co. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

DY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dycom Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 275.08M and revenue of 1.96B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.0%.

VRT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported a gross profit of 999.70M and revenue of 2.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.7%.

DY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dycom Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 143.75M and revenue of 1.96B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.3%.

VRT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported an operating income of 440.10M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.6%.

DY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dycom Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 91.29M and revenue of 1.96B, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.

VRT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported a net income of 390.10M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in a net margin of 14.7%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DY and VRT in my portfolio?

DY and VRT have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DY or VRT?

DY has higher volatility (26.09%) compared to VRT (16.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DY dropped -93.54% vs VRT's -71.24%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.