DXV.TO vs. TCSH.TO
DXV.TO (Dynamic Active Ultra Short Term Bond ETF) and TCSH.TO (TD Cash Management ETF) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DXV.TO returned 3.31% vs 2.57% for TCSH.TO. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. DXV.TO charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for TCSH.TO.
Performance
DXV.TO vs. TCSH.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DXV.TO achieves a 1.66% return, which is significantly higher than TCSH.TO's 1.18% return.
DXV.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- 6M
- 1.40%
- YTD
- 1.66%
- 1Y
- 3.31%
- 3Y*
- 4.62%
- 5Y*
- 3.70%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.11%
TCSH.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- 6M
- 1.18%
- YTD
- 1.18%
- 1Y
- 2.57%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.52%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$200.22K | CA$234.39K | CA$329.07K | |
TCSH.TO TD Cash Management ETF | CA$8.60M | CA$9.25M | CA$9.56M |
DXV.TO vs. TCSH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
DXV.TO Dynamic Active Ultra Short Term Bond ETF | 1.66% | 4.04% | 4.44% |
TCSH.TO TD Cash Management ETF | 1.18% | 3.09% | 4.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between DXV.TO and TCSH.TO is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2024 | -0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DXV.TO vs. TCSH.TO — Risk / Return Rank
DXV.TO
TCSH.TO
DXV.TO vs. TCSH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dynamic Active Ultra Short Term Bond ETF (DXV.TO) and TD Cash Management ETF (TCSH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DXV.TO | TCSH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -7.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 2.97 | -1.58 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.92 | 25.89 | -14.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 36.56 | 107.23 | -70.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DXV.TO vs. TCSH.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DXV.TO drawdown since its inception was -11.62%, which is greater than TCSH.TO's maximum drawdown of -0.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXV.TO and TCSH.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DXV.TO | TCSH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.62% | -0.54% | -11.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.30% | -0.10% | -0.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.66% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -2.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.05% | -0.04% | -0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.38% | -0.01% | -0.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.09% | 0.02% | +0.07% |
Volatility
DXV.TO vs. TCSH.TO - Volatility Comparison
Dynamic Active Ultra Short Term Bond ETF (DXV.TO) has a higher volatility of 0.48% compared to TD Cash Management ETF (TCSH.TO) at 0.09%. This indicates that DXV.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TCSH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DXV.TO | TCSH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.48% | 0.09% | +0.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.24% | 0.26% | +0.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.63% | 0.44% | +1.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.01% | 0.68% | +2.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.57% | 0.68% | +3.89% |
DXV.TO vs. TCSH.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
DXV.TO has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than TCSH.TO's 0.16% expense ratio.
Dividends
DXV.TO vs. TCSH.TO - Dividend Comparison
DXV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.10%, more than TCSH.TO's 2.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXV.TO Dynamic Active Ultra Short Term Bond ETF | 3.10% | 3.35% | 5.32% | 6.33% | 3.98% | 0.69% | 1.89% | 2.25% | 1.78% |
TCSH.TO TD Cash Management ETF | 2.60% | 3.03% | 4.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DXV.TO and TCSH.TO have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TCSH.TO is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TCSH.TO is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for DXV.TO.
They also come from different issuers: 1832 Asset Management L.P. (Dynamic Funds) and TD. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for DXV.TO and 0.16% for TCSH.TO.
Find the right allocation for DXV.TO and TCSH.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer