PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TCSH.TO vs. MNY.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TCSH.TO vs. MNY.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in TD Cash Management ETF (TCSH.TO) and Purpose Cash Management Fund (MNY.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TCSH.TO vs. MNY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TCSH.TO
TD Cash Management ETF
0.37%3.09%4.37%
MNY.TO
Purpose Cash Management Fund
0.53%3.03%4.04%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TCSH.TO achieves a 0.37% return, which is significantly lower than MNY.TO's 0.53% return.


TCSH.TO

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.12%
YTD
0.37%
6M
1.22%
1Y
2.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MNY.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
0.21%
YTD
0.53%
6M
1.27%
1Y
2.70%
3Y*
4.05%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TCSH.TO vs. MNY.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TCSH.TO has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than MNY.TO's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

TCSH.TO vs. MNY.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TCSH.TO
TCSH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
TCSH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCSH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCSH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
TCSH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCSH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

MNY.TO
MNY.TO Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
MNY.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNY.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNY.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
MNY.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNY.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TCSH.TO vs. MNY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TD Cash Management ETF (TCSH.TO) and Purpose Cash Management Fund (MNY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TCSH.TOMNY.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

5.78

15.40

-9.62

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

10.76

52.97

-42.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

2.86

20.07

-17.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

26.59

67.62

-41.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

107.81

621.44

-513.63

TCSH.TO vs. MNY.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TCSH.TO Sharpe Ratio is 5.78, which is lower than the MNY.TO Sharpe Ratio of 15.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TCSH.TO and MNY.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TCSH.TOMNY.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.78

15.40

-9.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

5.30

11.03

-5.73

Correlation

The correlation between TCSH.TO and MNY.TO is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

TCSH.TO vs. MNY.TO - Dividend Comparison

TCSH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%, more than MNY.TO's 2.67% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
TCSH.TO
TD Cash Management ETF
2.74%3.03%4.21%0.00%0.00%
MNY.TO
Purpose Cash Management Fund
2.67%2.93%4.71%4.85%1.47%

Drawdowns

TCSH.TO vs. MNY.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TCSH.TO drawdown since its inception was -0.54%, which is greater than MNY.TO's maximum drawdown of -0.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCSH.TO and MNY.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TCSH.TOMNY.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.54%

-0.24%

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.10%

-0.04%

-0.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

0.00%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.01%

0.00%

-0.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.02%

0.00%

+0.02%

Volatility

TCSH.TO vs. MNY.TO - Volatility Comparison

TD Cash Management ETF (TCSH.TO) has a higher volatility of 0.13% compared to Purpose Cash Management Fund (MNY.TO) at 0.03%. This indicates that TCSH.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNY.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TCSH.TOMNY.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.13%

0.03%

+0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.37%

0.13%

+0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46%

0.18%

+0.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.71%

0.38%

+0.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.71%

0.38%

+0.33%