DXV.TO vs. PCOR.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Dynamic Active Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (DXV.TO) and PIMCO Managed Core Bond Pool (PCOR.TO).
DXV.TO and PCOR.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day.
Performance
DXV.TO vs. PCOR.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DXV.TO vs. PCOR.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXV.TO Dynamic Active Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF | 0.54% | 4.04% | 5.84% | 6.04% | 1.49% | -0.21% | 3.37% |
PCOR.TO PIMCO Managed Core Bond Pool | -1.13% | 7.70% | 3.89% | 8.31% | -9.47% | 0.70% | 3.78% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DXV.TO achieves a 0.54% return, which is significantly higher than PCOR.TO's -1.13% return.
DXV.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 0.54%
- 6M
- 1.31%
- 1Y
- 3.67%
- 3Y*
- 5.05%
- 5Y*
- 3.42%
- 10Y*
- —
PCOR.TO
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -2.52%
- YTD
- -1.13%
- 6M
- 0.08%
- 1Y
- 3.55%
- 3Y*
- 5.59%
- 5Y*
- 2.07%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DXV.TO vs. PCOR.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Return for Risk
DXV.TO vs. PCOR.TO — Risk / Return Rank
DXV.TO
PCOR.TO
DXV.TO vs. PCOR.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dynamic Active Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (DXV.TO) and PIMCO Managed Core Bond Pool (PCOR.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DXV.TO | PCOR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.45 | 0.53 | +1.92 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.78 | 0.81 | +2.96 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.10 | +0.41 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.14 | 1.01 | +6.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 35.41 | 2.90 | +32.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DXV.TO | PCOR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.45 | 0.53 | +1.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.13 | 0.27 | +0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.28 | +0.39 |
Correlation
The correlation between DXV.TO and PCOR.TO is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
DXV.TO vs. PCOR.TO - Dividend Comparison
DXV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.17%, less than PCOR.TO's 5.09% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXV.TO Dynamic Active Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF | 3.17% | 3.35% | 5.32% | 6.33% | 3.98% | 0.69% | 1.89% | 2.25% | 1.78% |
PCOR.TO PIMCO Managed Core Bond Pool | 5.09% | 5.30% | 5.40% | 3.50% | 3.41% | 2.81% | 2.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
DXV.TO vs. PCOR.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DXV.TO drawdown since its inception was -11.62%, smaller than the maximum PCOR.TO drawdown of -13.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXV.TO and PCOR.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DXV.TO | PCOR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.62% | -13.53% | +1.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.51% | -3.73% | +3.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -2.71% | -13.53% | +10.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.11% | -2.62% | +2.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.39% | -3.57% | +3.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.10% | 1.31% | -1.21% |
Volatility
DXV.TO vs. PCOR.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dynamic Active Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (DXV.TO) is 0.62%, while PIMCO Managed Core Bond Pool (PCOR.TO) has a volatility of 1.90%. This indicates that DXV.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PCOR.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DXV.TO | PCOR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.62% | 1.90% | -1.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.19% | 3.87% | -2.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.50% | 6.68% | -5.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.05% | 7.67% | -4.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.68% | 7.53% | -2.85% |