DXV.TO vs. MNU-U.TO

Last updated Jul 25, 2026

DXV.TO (Dynamic Active Ultra Short Term Bond ETF) and MNU-U.TO (Purpose USD Cash Management ETF) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, DXV.TO returned 4.62%/yr vs 7.11%/yr for MNU-U.TO. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DXV.TO charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for MNU-U.TO.

Performance

DXV.TO vs. MNU-U.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Dynamic Active Ultra Short Term Bond ETF (DXV.TO) and Purpose USD Cash Management ETF (MNU-U.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

DXV.TO is traded in CAD, while MNU-U.TO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MNU-U.TO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DXV.TO achieves a 1.66% return, which is significantly lower than MNU-U.TO's 5.05% return.

DXV.TO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.30%
• 6M: 1.40%
• YTD: 1.66%
• 1Y: 3.31%
• 3Y*: 4.62%
• 5Y*: 3.70%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 3.11%

MNU-U.TO

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: -0.50%
• 6M: 4.11%
• YTD: 5.05%
• 1Y: 7.62%
• 3Y*: 7.11%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 5.85%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DXV.TO Dynamic Active Ultra Short Term Bond ETF	CA$200.22K	CA$234.39K	CA$329.07K
MNU-U.TO Purpose USD Cash Management ETF	CA$567.31K	CA$538.35K	CA$506.43K

DXV.TO vs. MNU-U.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
DXV.TO Dynamic Active Ultra Short Term Bond ETF	1.66%	4.04%	5.84%	4.05%
MNU-U.TO Purpose USD Cash Management ETF	5.05%	-0.55%	14.20%	0.78%

Correlation

The correlation between DXV.TO and MNU-U.TO is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.03
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2023	0.06

The correlation between DXV.TO and MNU-U.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.08 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

DXV.TO vs. MNU-U.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DXV.TO

DXV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 92
DXV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
DXV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
DXV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 88
DXV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
DXV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 97

MNU-U.TO

MNU-U.TO Risk / Return Rank: 100
MNU-U.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MNU-U.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
MNU-U.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 100
MNU-U.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
MNU-U.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DXV.TO vs. MNU-U.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dynamic Active Ultra Short Term Bond ETF (DXV.TO) and Purpose USD Cash Management ETF (MNU-U.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DXV.TO	MNU-U.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.03	1.77	+0.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.12	2.48	+0.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.33	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	10.92	2.03	+8.89
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	36.56	5.55	+31.01

DXV.TO vs. MNU-U.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DXV.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is comparable to the MNU-U.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DXV.TO and MNU-U.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DXV.TO vs. MNU-U.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DXV.TO drawdown since its inception was -11.62%, which is greater than MNU-U.TO's maximum drawdown of -6.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXV.TO and MNU-U.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	DXV.TO	MNU-U.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.62%	-6.27%	-5.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.30%	-3.77%	+3.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.66%	-6.27%	+5.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-2.71%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.05%	-0.68%	+0.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.38%	-1.81%	+1.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.09%	1.38%	-1.29%

Volatility

DXV.TO vs. MNU-U.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dynamic Active Ultra Short Term Bond ETF (DXV.TO) is 0.48%, while Purpose USD Cash Management ETF (MNU-U.TO) has a volatility of 0.99%. This indicates that DXV.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MNU-U.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DXV.TO	MNU-U.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.48%	0.99%	-0.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.24%	3.28%	-2.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.63%	4.31%	-2.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.01%	5.36%	-2.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.57%	5.36%	-0.79%

DXV.TO vs. MNU-U.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

DXV.TO has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than MNU-U.TO's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

DXV.TO vs. MNU-U.TO - Dividend Comparison

DXV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.10%, less than MNU-U.TO's 3.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
DXV.TO Dynamic Active Ultra Short Term Bond ETF	3.10%	3.35%	5.32%	6.33%	3.98%	0.69%	1.89%	2.25%	1.78%
MNU-U.TO Purpose USD Cash Management ETF	3.80%	4.17%	5.26%	3.62%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DXV.TO and MNU-U.TO in my portfolio?

DXV.TO and MNU-U.TO have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DXV.TO or MNU-U.TO?

On fees, MNU-U.TO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DXV.TO or MNU-U.TO?

MNU-U.TO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for DXV.TO.

What is the main difference between DXV.TO and MNU-U.TO?

They also come from different issuers: 1832 Asset Management L.P. (Dynamic Funds) and Purpose Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for DXV.TO and 0.20% for MNU-U.TO.