PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MNU-U.TO vs. ZST.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MNU-U.TO vs. ZST.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Purpose USD Cash Management ETF (MNU-U.TO) and BMO Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF (ZST.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MNU-U.TO is traded in USD, while ZST.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the ZST.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNU-U.TO achieves a 1.13% return, which is significantly higher than ZST.TO's -0.17% return.


MNU-U.TO

1D
0.01%
1M
0.21%
YTD
1.13%
6M
1.28%
1Y
2.83%
3Y*
3.61%
5Y*
10Y*

ZST.TO

1D
-0.38%
1M
-1.74%
YTD
-0.17%
6M
0.66%
1Y
0.39%
3Y*
2.66%
5Y*
0.11%
10Y*
1.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MNU-U.TO vs. ZST.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
MNU-U.TO
Purpose USD Cash Management ETF
1.13%2.98%4.23%2.87%
ZST.TO
BMO Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF
-0.17%6.92%-3.15%6.46%

Correlation

The correlation between MNU-U.TO and ZST.TO is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2023

-0.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MNU-U.TO vs. ZST.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MNU-U.TO
MNU-U.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
MNU-U.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNU-U.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNU-U.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
MNU-U.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNU-U.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

ZST.TO
ZST.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
ZST.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZST.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZST.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
ZST.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZST.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MNU-U.TO vs. ZST.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose USD Cash Management ETF (MNU-U.TO) and BMO Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF (ZST.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MNU-U.TOZST.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+7.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+9.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

3.65

1.02

+2.63

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

17.71

0.14

+17.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

96.29

0.27

+96.03

MNU-U.TO vs. ZST.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MNU-U.TO Sharpe Ratio is 7.16, which is higher than the ZST.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MNU-U.TO and ZST.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MNU-U.TOZST.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.16

0.08

+7.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

6.00

-0.01

+6.02

Drawdowns

MNU-U.TO vs. ZST.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNU-U.TO drawdown since its inception was -0.43%, smaller than the maximum ZST.TO drawdown of -31.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNU-U.TO and ZST.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MNU-U.TOZST.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.43%

-31.09%

+30.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.16%

-2.77%

+2.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.43%

-6.16%

+5.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.00%

-8.39%

+8.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.02%

-13.91%

+13.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.03%

1.44%

-1.41%

Volatility

MNU-U.TO vs. ZST.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Purpose USD Cash Management ETF (MNU-U.TO) is 0.09%, while BMO Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF (ZST.TO) has a volatility of 0.80%. This indicates that MNU-U.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZST.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MNU-U.TOZST.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.09%

0.80%

-0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.28%

3.54%

-3.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40%

4.62%

-4.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.61%

6.37%

-5.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.61%

6.79%

-6.18%

MNU-U.TO vs. ZST.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MNU-U.TO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than ZST.TO's 0.17% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MNU-U.TO vs. ZST.TO - Dividend Comparison

MNU-U.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, more than ZST.TO's 2.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MNU-U.TO
Purpose USD Cash Management ETF
2.79%2.98%4.25%2.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZST.TO
BMO Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF
2.55%2.82%4.65%4.79%2.75%2.29%2.65%2.82%3.43%4.05%3.92%3.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


MNU-U.TO and ZST.TO have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZST.TO is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZST.TO is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for MNU-U.TO.

MNU-U.TO is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while ZST.TO is Canadian Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Purpose Investments and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for MNU-U.TO and 0.17% for ZST.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MNU-U.TO and ZST.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer