DXUV vs. DIV
DXUV (Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF) and DIV (Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. DXUV is actively managed, while DIV is passively managed. Over the past year, DXUV returned 24.78% vs 17.11% for DIV. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DXUV charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for DIV.
Performance
DXUV vs. DIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DXUV achieves a 10.49% return, which is significantly lower than DIV's 13.45% return.
DXUV
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -0.03%
- YTD
- 10.49%
- 6M
- 8.89%
- 1Y
- 24.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DIV
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -1.17%
- YTD
- 13.45%
- 6M
- 13.28%
- 1Y
- 17.11%
- 3Y*
- 12.40%
- 5Y*
- 5.53%
- 10Y*
- 4.29%
DXUV vs. DIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
DXUV Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF | 10.49% | 14.34% | 5.03% |
DIV Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF | 13.45% | 3.10% | 1.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between DXUV and DIV is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2024 | 0.55 |
The correlation between DXUV and DIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
DXUV vs. DIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DXUV
DIV
Technology
-
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Communication Services
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
DXUV
DIV
-
Financial Services
DXUV
DIV
Industrials
DXUV
DIV
Consumer Cyclical
DXUV
DIV
Healthcare
DXUV
DIV
Communication Services
DXUV
DIV
Energy
DXUV
DIV
Consumer Defensive
DXUV
DIV
Basic Materials
DXUV
DIV
Utilities
DXUV
DIV
Real Estate
DXUV
DIV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DXUV vs. DIV — Risk / Return Rank
DXUV
DIV
DXUV vs. DIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF (DXUV) and Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DXUV | DIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.28 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.92 | 3.29 | -0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.77 | 8.91 | +2.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DXUV vs. DIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DXUV drawdown since its inception was -21.08%, smaller than the maximum DIV drawdown of -52.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXUV and DIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DXUV | DIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.08% | -52.74% | +31.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.53% | -5.23% | -3.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.33% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -52.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.23% | -1.62% | +0.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.01% | -7.00% | +3.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.11% | 1.92% | +0.19% |
Volatility
DXUV vs. DIV - Volatility Comparison
Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF (DXUV) has a higher volatility of 4.01% compared to Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) at 3.67%. This indicates that DXUV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DXUV | DIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.01% | 3.67% | +0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.51% | 7.47% | +2.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.95% | 10.64% | +2.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.24% | 13.69% | +3.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.24% | 17.99% | -0.75% |
DXUV vs. DIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
DXUV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than DIV's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
DXUV vs. DIV - Dividend Comparison
DXUV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than DIV's 6.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIV Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF | 6.76% | 7.30% | 5.74% | 7.13% | 6.62% | 5.24% | 8.01% | 7.65% | 7.08% | 5.92% | 6.78% | 8.44% |
DXUV Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF | 1.00% | 1.01% | 0.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DXUV and DIV have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DXUV has higher volatility (4.01%) compared to DIV (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DXUV dropped -21.08% vs DIV's -52.74%.
On 1-year performance, DXUV leads with 24.78% vs 17.11% for DIV. On fees, DXUV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, DIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DXUV has performed better with a 24.78% return vs 17.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DXUV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for DIV.
DIV has the higher dividend yield at 6.76%, compared with 1.00% for DXUV.
They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for DXUV and 0.45% for DIV.
DXUV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DXUV and DIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer