YCST.NEO vs. HDIV.TO
YCST.NEO (Costco (COST) Yield Shares Purpose ETF) and HDIV.TO (Hamilton Enhanced Multi-Sector Covered Call ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, YCST.NEO returned -8.87% vs 53.23% for HDIV.TO. At 0.05, their price movements are largely independent. YCST.NEO charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for HDIV.TO.
Performance
YCST.NEO vs. HDIV.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YCST.NEO achieves a 10.27% return, which is significantly higher than HDIV.TO's 9.31% return.
YCST.NEO
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- -4.20%
- YTD
- 10.27%
- 6M
- -2.20%
- 1Y
- -8.87%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HDIV.TO
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 6.83%
- YTD
- 9.31%
- 6M
- 15.01%
- 1Y
- 53.23%
- 3Y*
- 23.87%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YCST.NEO vs. HDIV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
YCST.NEO Costco (COST) Yield Shares Purpose ETF | 10.27% | -23.79% |
HDIV.TO Hamilton Enhanced Multi-Sector Covered Call ETF | 9.31% | 28.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between YCST.NEO and HDIV.TO is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2025 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YCST.NEO vs. HDIV.TO — Risk / Return Rank
YCST.NEO
HDIV.TO
YCST.NEO vs. HDIV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Costco (COST) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YCST.NEO) and Hamilton Enhanced Multi-Sector Covered Call ETF (HDIV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| YCST.NEO | HDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.44 | 4.42 | -4.86 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.49 | 5.51 | -6.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.85 | -0.91 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.39 | 6.71 | -7.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.71 | 32.80 | -33.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| YCST.NEO | HDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.44 | 4.42 | -4.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.59 | 1.20 | -1.79 |
Drawdowns
YCST.NEO vs. HDIV.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YCST.NEO drawdown since its inception was -25.53%, which is greater than HDIV.TO's maximum drawdown of -22.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YCST.NEO and HDIV.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| YCST.NEO | HDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.53% | -22.32% | -3.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.19% | -8.73% | -15.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.10% | 0.00% | -17.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.36% | -4.33% | -9.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.19% | 1.79% | +11.40% |
Volatility
YCST.NEO vs. HDIV.TO - Volatility Comparison
Costco (COST) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YCST.NEO) has a higher volatility of 6.10% compared to Hamilton Enhanced Multi-Sector Covered Call ETF (HDIV.TO) at 5.44%. This indicates that YCST.NEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDIV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| YCST.NEO | HDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.10% | 5.44% | +0.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.54% | 10.67% | +4.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.43% | 12.21% | +8.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.88% | 15.72% | +8.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.88% | 15.72% | +8.16% |
YCST.NEO vs. HDIV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
YCST.NEO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than HDIV.TO's 0.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
YCST.NEO vs. HDIV.TO - Dividend Comparison
YCST.NEO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HDIV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.62%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
YCST.NEO Costco (COST) Yield Shares Purpose ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HDIV.TO Hamilton Enhanced Multi-Sector Covered Call ETF | 9.62% | 10.09% | 11.38% | 10.41% | 9.64% | 3.39% |