PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DXQ.TO vs. DXMO.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DXQ.TO vs. DXMO.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Dynamic Active Enhanced Yield Covered Options ETF (DXQ.TO) and Dynamic Active Mining Opportunities ETF (DXMO.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DXQ.TO vs. DXMO.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
DXQ.TO
Dynamic Active Enhanced Yield Covered Options ETF
-0.26%12.99%10.08%
DXMO.TO
Dynamic Active Mining Opportunities ETF
6.73%88.43%-9.23%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DXQ.TO achieves a -0.26% return, which is significantly lower than DXMO.TO's 6.73% return.


DXQ.TO

1D
0.07%
1M
-0.91%
YTD
-0.26%
6M
0.81%
1Y
17.27%
3Y*
15.56%
5Y*
10Y*

DXMO.TO

1D
3.10%
1M
-13.78%
YTD
6.73%
6M
17.78%
1Y
78.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DXQ.TO vs. DXMO.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

DXQ.TO has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than DXMO.TO's 0.74% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

DXQ.TO vs. DXMO.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DXQ.TO
DXQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
DXQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DXQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
DXQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
DXQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
DXQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

DXMO.TO
DXMO.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
DXMO.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DXMO.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
DXMO.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
DXMO.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
DXMO.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DXQ.TO vs. DXMO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dynamic Active Enhanced Yield Covered Options ETF (DXQ.TO) and Dynamic Active Mining Opportunities ETF (DXMO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DXQ.TODXMO.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.08

2.17

-1.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.59

2.51

-0.93

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.38

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.79

2.92

-1.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.29

10.83

-3.54

DXQ.TO vs. DXMO.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DXQ.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is lower than the DXMO.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DXQ.TO and DXMO.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DXQ.TODXMO.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.08

2.17

-1.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.48

1.22

+0.26

Correlation

The correlation between DXQ.TO and DXMO.TO is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

DXQ.TO vs. DXMO.TO - Dividend Comparison

DXQ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.98%, more than DXMO.TO's 0.17% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
DXQ.TO
Dynamic Active Enhanced Yield Covered Options ETF
7.98%7.45%5.74%6.54%1.83%
DXMO.TO
Dynamic Active Mining Opportunities ETF
0.17%0.18%0.50%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

DXQ.TO vs. DXMO.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DXQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -15.54%, smaller than the maximum DXMO.TO drawdown of -26.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXQ.TO and DXMO.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DXQ.TODXMO.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.54%

-26.12%

+10.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.85%

-26.12%

+16.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.37%

-13.78%

+10.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.30%

-5.21%

+3.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.43%

7.04%

-4.61%

Volatility

DXQ.TO vs. DXMO.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dynamic Active Enhanced Yield Covered Options ETF (DXQ.TO) is 4.13%, while Dynamic Active Mining Opportunities ETF (DXMO.TO) has a volatility of 16.02%. This indicates that DXQ.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DXMO.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DXQ.TODXMO.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.13%

16.02%

-11.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.15%

30.45%

-23.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.04%

36.58%

-20.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.99%

34.05%

-23.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.99%

34.05%

-23.06%