DXQ.TO vs. DXP.TO
DXQ.TO (Dynamic Active Enhanced Yield Covered Options ETF) and DXP.TO (Dynamic Active Preferred Shares ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DXQ.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Dynamic, while DXP.TO is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund actively managed by Dynamic. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, DXQ.TO returned 17.60%/yr vs 17.89%/yr for DXP.TO. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DXQ.TO charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for DXP.TO.
Performance
DXQ.TO vs. DXP.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DXQ.TO achieves a 7.89% return, which is significantly higher than DXP.TO's 4.44% return.
DXQ.TO
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 2.12%
- YTD
- 7.89%
- 6M
- 8.04%
- 1Y
- 18.60%
- 3Y*
- 17.60%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DXP.TO
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- 4.44%
- 6M
- 5.17%
- 1Y
- 14.53%
- 3Y*
- 17.89%
- 5Y*
- 8.00%
- 10Y*
- —
DXQ.TO vs. DXP.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXQ.TO Dynamic Active Enhanced Yield Covered Options ETF | 7.89% | 12.99% | 21.07% | 20.08% | 3.57% |
DXP.TO Dynamic Active Preferred Shares ETF | 4.44% | 17.64% | 25.73% | 8.22% | -5.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between DXQ.TO and DXP.TO is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2022 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DXQ.TO vs. DXP.TO — Risk / Return Rank
DXQ.TO
DXP.TO
DXQ.TO vs. DXP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dynamic Active Enhanced Yield Covered Options ETF (DXQ.TO) and Dynamic Active Preferred Shares ETF (DXP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DXQ.TO | DXP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.74 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.65 | 6.07 | -2.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.16 | 30.11 | -19.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DXQ.TO vs. DXP.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DXQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -15.54%, smaller than the maximum DXP.TO drawdown of -40.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXQ.TO and DXP.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DXQ.TO | DXP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.54% | -40.72% | +25.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.11% | -2.40% | -2.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.54% | -8.30% | -7.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.11% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.38% | -0.04% | -1.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.26% | -6.61% | +5.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.84% | 0.48% | +1.36% |
Volatility
DXQ.TO vs. DXP.TO - Volatility Comparison
Dynamic Active Enhanced Yield Covered Options ETF (DXQ.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.17% compared to Dynamic Active Preferred Shares ETF (DXP.TO) at 0.94%. This indicates that DXQ.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DXP.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DXQ.TO | DXP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.17% | 0.94% | +2.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.56% | 2.55% | +5.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.36% | 4.02% | +5.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.93% | 9.28% | +1.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.93% | 12.22% | -1.29% |
DXQ.TO vs. DXP.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
DXQ.TO has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than DXP.TO's 0.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
DXQ.TO vs. DXP.TO - Dividend Comparison
DXQ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.69%, more than DXP.TO's 4.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXP.TO Dynamic Active Preferred Shares ETF | 4.40% | 4.52% | 5.05% | 5.31% | 4.58% | 3.67% | 4.51% | 4.53% | 4.50% | 3.36% |
DXQ.TO Dynamic Active Enhanced Yield Covered Options ETF | 7.69% | 7.45% | 5.74% | 6.54% | 1.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DXQ.TO and DXP.TO have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DXP.TO is cheaper at 0.64% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DXP.TO is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for DXQ.TO.
DXQ.TO is categorized as Derivative Income, while DXP.TO is Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for DXQ.TO and 0.64% for DXP.TO.
Find the right allocation for DXQ.TO and DXP.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer