DXQ.TO vs. DXN.TO
DXQ.TO (Dynamic Active Enhanced Yield Covered Options ETF) and DXN.TO (Dynamic Active Global Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DXQ.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Dynamic, while DXN.TO is a Industrials Equities fund actively managed by Dynamic. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, DXQ.TO returned 16.41%/yr vs 13.76%/yr for DXN.TO. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DXQ.TO vs. DXN.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DXQ.TO achieves a 7.11% return, which is significantly lower than DXN.TO's 12.39% return.
DXQ.TO
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- -0.13%
- 6M
- 4.29%
- YTD
- 7.11%
- 1Y
- 14.08%
- 3Y*
- 16.41%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DXN.TO
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- 6M
- 9.78%
- YTD
- 12.39%
- 1Y
- 18.42%
- 3Y*
- 13.76%
- 5Y*
- 9.31%
- 10Y*
- —
DXQ.TO vs. DXN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXQ.TO Dynamic Active Enhanced Yield Covered Options ETF | 7.11% | 12.99% | 21.07% | 20.08% | 3.57% |
DXN.TO Dynamic Active Global Infrastructure ETF | 12.39% | 15.33% | 15.13% | -0.89% | -3.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between DXQ.TO and DXN.TO is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2022 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DXQ.TO vs. DXN.TO — Risk / Return Rank
DXQ.TO
DXN.TO
DXQ.TO vs. DXN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dynamic Active Enhanced Yield Covered Options ETF (DXQ.TO) and Dynamic Active Global Infrastructure ETF (DXN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DXQ.TO | DXN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.30 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.76 | 2.85 | -0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.58 | 8.56 | -0.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DXQ.TO vs. DXN.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DXQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -15.54%, smaller than the maximum DXN.TO drawdown of -34.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXQ.TO and DXN.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DXQ.TO | DXN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.54% | -34.85% | +19.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.11% | -6.50% | +1.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.54% | -14.79% | -0.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.55% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.10% | -2.42% | +0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.25% | -5.74% | +4.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.86% | 2.16% | -0.30% |
Volatility
DXQ.TO vs. DXN.TO - Volatility Comparison
Dynamic Active Enhanced Yield Covered Options ETF (DXQ.TO) and Dynamic Active Global Infrastructure ETF (DXN.TO) have volatilities of 2.61% and 2.73%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DXQ.TO | DXN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.61% | 2.73% | -0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.59% | 8.81% | -1.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.33% | 11.06% | -1.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.86% | 12.84% | -1.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.86% | 16.65% | -5.79% |
Dividends
DXQ.TO vs. DXN.TO - Dividend Comparison
DXQ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.91%, more than DXN.TO's 2.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXN.TO Dynamic Active Global Infrastructure ETF | 2.01% | 2.10% | 3.26% | 2.30% | 1.21% | 0.91% | 0.35% |
DXQ.TO Dynamic Active Enhanced Yield Covered Options ETF | 7.91% | 7.45% | 5.74% | 6.54% | 1.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DXQ.TO and DXN.TO have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DXQ.TO is categorized as Derivative Income, while DXN.TO is Industrials Equities.
Find the right allocation for DXQ.TO and DXN.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer