DXN.TO vs. QIF.NEO
DXN.TO (Dynamic Active Global Infrastructure ETF) and QIF.NEO (AGF Systematic Global Infrastructure ETF) are both Industrials Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DXN.TO returned 9.42%/yr vs 11.27%/yr for QIF.NEO. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DXN.TO vs. QIF.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DXN.TO having a 13.74% return and QIF.NEO slightly lower at 13.73%.
DXN.TO
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 1.83%
- 6M
- 12.29%
- YTD
- 13.74%
- 1Y
- 19.11%
- 3Y*
- 13.79%
- 5Y*
- 9.42%
- 10Y*
- —
QIF.NEO
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- -0.40%
- 6M
- 10.78%
- YTD
- 13.73%
- 1Y
- 22.63%
- 3Y*
- 17.37%
- 5Y*
- 11.27%
- 10Y*
- —
DXN.TO vs. QIF.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXN.TO Dynamic Active Global Infrastructure ETF | 13.74% | 15.33% | 15.13% | -0.89% | -1.00% | 10.60% | -7.54% |
QIF.NEO AGF Systematic Global Infrastructure ETF | 13.73% | 14.80% | 21.37% | 4.72% | -2.67% | 20.54% | -15.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between DXN.TO and QIF.NEO is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2020 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DXN.TO vs. QIF.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
DXN.TO
QIF.NEO
DXN.TO vs. QIF.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dynamic Active Global Infrastructure ETF (DXN.TO) and AGF Systematic Global Infrastructure ETF (QIF.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DXN.TO | QIF.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.43 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.08 | 4.89 | -1.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.32 | 13.28 | -3.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DXN.TO vs. QIF.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DXN.TO drawdown since its inception was -34.85%, which is greater than QIF.NEO's maximum drawdown of -30.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXN.TO and QIF.NEO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DXN.TO | QIF.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.85% | -30.71% | -4.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.50% | -4.67% | -1.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.79% | -10.29% | -4.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.55% | -15.54% | -3.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.25% | -2.34% | +1.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.74% | -4.33% | -1.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.14% | 1.71% | +0.43% |
Volatility
DXN.TO vs. QIF.NEO - Volatility Comparison
Dynamic Active Global Infrastructure ETF (DXN.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.92% compared to AGF Systematic Global Infrastructure ETF (QIF.NEO) at 2.29%. This indicates that DXN.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QIF.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DXN.TO | QIF.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.92% | 2.29% | +0.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.88% | 7.76% | +1.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.16% | 9.72% | +1.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.85% | 11.66% | +1.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.67% | 14.78% | +1.89% |
Dividends
DXN.TO vs. QIF.NEO - Dividend Comparison
DXN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, less than QIF.NEO's 5.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXN.TO Dynamic Active Global Infrastructure ETF | 1.98% | 2.10% | 3.26% | 2.30% | 1.21% | 0.91% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QIF.NEO AGF Systematic Global Infrastructure ETF | 5.14% | 5.32% | 4.60% | 3.61% | 3.22% | 3.05% | 3.12% | 3.16% | 2.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DXN.TO and QIF.NEO have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: Dynamic and AGF.
Find the right allocation for DXN.TO and QIF.NEO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer