PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DXJ vs. GDMN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DXJ vs. GDMN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DXJ achieves a 18.76% return, which is significantly higher than GDMN's -0.46% return.


DXJ

1D
1.14%
1M
6.07%
YTD
18.76%
6M
23.03%
1Y
52.60%
3Y*
32.82%
5Y*
26.08%
10Y*
18.25%

GDMN

1D
1.35%
1M
-2.21%
YTD
-0.46%
6M
6.04%
1Y
82.68%
3Y*
62.97%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DXJ vs. GDMN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DXJ
WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund
18.76%32.78%29.83%42.04%5.96%-0.03%
GDMN
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund
-0.46%237.09%28.23%12.97%-14.62%5.11%

Correlation

The correlation between DXJ and GDMN is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2021

0.14

The correlation between DXJ and GDMN shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (all time) to 0.27 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DXJ vs. GDMN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DXJ
GDMN

Industrials

27.4%

-

Financial Services

18.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

15.6%

-

Technology

12.9%

-

Basic Materials

8.5%
100.0%

Healthcare

6.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.7%

-

Communication Services

2.7%

-

Energy

1.7%

-

Utilities

0.1%

-

Real Estate

-

-

Industrials

DXJ
27.4%
GDMN

-

Financial Services

DXJ
18.3%
GDMN

-

Consumer Cyclical

DXJ
15.6%
GDMN

-

Technology

DXJ
12.9%
GDMN

-

Basic Materials

DXJ
8.5%
GDMN
100.0%

Healthcare

DXJ
6.8%
GDMN

-

Consumer Defensive

DXJ
4.7%
GDMN

-

Communication Services

DXJ
2.7%
GDMN

-

Energy

DXJ
1.7%
GDMN

-

Utilities

DXJ
0.1%
GDMN

-

Real Estate

DXJ

-

GDMN

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DXJ vs. GDMN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DXJ
DXJ Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
DXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
DXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
DXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
DXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

GDMN
GDMN Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
GDMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDMN Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
GDMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDMN Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DXJ vs. GDMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DXJGDMNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.03

1.36

+1.67

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.12

1.75

+2.37

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.26

+0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.83

2.43

+2.39

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

18.88

5.81

+13.07

DXJ vs. GDMN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DXJ Sharpe Ratio is 3.03, which is higher than the GDMN Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DXJ and GDMN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DXJGDMNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.03

1.36

+1.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.83

-0.40

Drawdowns

DXJ vs. GDMN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DXJ drawdown since its inception was -49.63%, smaller than the maximum GDMN drawdown of -52.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXJ and GDMN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DXJGDMNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.63%

-52.82%

+3.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.98%

-39.03%

+28.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.19%

-39.03%

+16.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.36%

-34.66%

+34.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.34%

-18.87%

+4.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.81%

16.34%

-13.53%

Volatility

DXJ vs. GDMN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ) is 3.59%, while WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN) has a volatility of 17.89%. This indicates that DXJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDMN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DXJGDMNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.59%

17.89%

-14.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.11%

51.66%

-38.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.43%

61.52%

-44.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.96%

47.57%

-28.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.18%

47.57%

-27.39%

DXJ vs. GDMN - Expense Ratio Comparison

DXJ has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than GDMN's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

DXJ vs. GDMN - Dividend Comparison

DXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, less than GDMN's 2.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DXJ
WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund
1.09%1.29%3.48%3.44%3.02%2.64%2.53%2.47%2.92%2.30%1.98%5.95%
GDMN
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund
2.71%2.70%9.44%7.69%1.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DXJ and GDMN have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GDMN has higher volatility (17.89%) compared to DXJ (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DXJ dropped -49.63% vs GDMN's -52.82%.

On 3-year performance, GDMN leads with 62.97% vs 32.82% for DXJ. On fees, GDMN is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, DXJ has been the lower-risk option at 3.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, GDMN has performed better with a 62.97% return vs 32.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GDMN is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for DXJ.

GDMN has the higher dividend yield at 2.71%, compared with 1.09% for DXJ.

DXJ is categorized as Japan Equities, while GDMN is Commodities. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for DXJ and 0.45% for GDMN.

DXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.03 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DXJ and GDMN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer