DXBB.TO vs. DXZ.TO
DXBB.TO (Dynamic Active Bond ETF) and DXZ.TO (Dynamic Active U.S. Mid-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DXBB.TO is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Dynamic, while DXZ.TO is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Dynamic. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DXBB.TO returned 4.74% vs 10.20% for DXZ.TO. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DXBB.TO vs. DXZ.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DXBB.TO achieves a 1.67% return, which is significantly lower than DXZ.TO's 11.05% return.
DXBB.TO
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -0.61%
- 6M
- 1.21%
- YTD
- 1.67%
- 1Y
- 4.74%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DXZ.TO
- 1D
- 1.43%
- 1M
- 3.66%
- 6M
- 5.20%
- YTD
- 11.05%
- 1Y
- 10.20%
- 3Y*
- 9.27%
- 5Y*
- 4.82%
- 10Y*
- —
DXBB.TO vs. DXZ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
DXBB.TO Dynamic Active Bond ETF | 1.67% | 2.85% | 1.20% |
DXZ.TO Dynamic Active U.S. Mid-Cap ETF | 11.05% | -6.29% | 0.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between DXBB.TO and DXZ.TO is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2024 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DXBB.TO vs. DXZ.TO — Risk / Return Rank
DXBB.TO
DXZ.TO
DXBB.TO vs. DXZ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dynamic Active Bond ETF (DXBB.TO) and Dynamic Active U.S. Mid-Cap ETF (DXZ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DXBB.TO | DXZ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.14 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.71 | 1.16 | +0.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.80 | 3.07 | +1.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DXBB.TO vs. DXZ.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DXBB.TO drawdown since its inception was -3.23%, smaller than the maximum DXZ.TO drawdown of -27.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXBB.TO and DXZ.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DXBB.TO | DXZ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.23% | -27.44% | +24.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.79% | -8.80% | +6.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.90% | -2.22% | +1.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.16% | -6.70% | +5.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.99% | 3.33% | -2.34% |
Volatility
DXBB.TO vs. DXZ.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dynamic Active Bond ETF (DXBB.TO) is 1.48%, while Dynamic Active U.S. Mid-Cap ETF (DXZ.TO) has a volatility of 3.65%. This indicates that DXBB.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DXZ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DXBB.TO | DXZ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.48% | 3.65% | -2.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.44% | 10.42% | -6.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.27% | 14.52% | -10.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.89% | 15.57% | -10.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.89% | 22.21% | -17.32% |
Dividends
DXBB.TO vs. DXZ.TO - Dividend Comparison
DXBB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%, more than DXZ.TO's 0.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXBB.TO Dynamic Active Bond ETF | 4.26% | 4.24% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DXZ.TO Dynamic Active U.S. Mid-Cap ETF | 0.29% | 0.32% | 0.43% | 0.63% | 0.07% | 0.36% | 0.85% | 0.45% | 0.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DXBB.TO and DXZ.TO have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DXBB.TO is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while DXZ.TO is Mid Cap Blend Equities.
Find the right allocation for DXBB.TO and DXZ.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer