PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
DXBB.TO vs. XGRO.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

DXBB.TO vs. XGRO.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Dynamic Active Bond ETF (DXBB.TO) and iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio (XGRO.TO).

DXBB.TO and XGRO.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DXBB.TO is an actively managed fund by Dynamic. It was launched on Oct 31, 2024. XGRO.TO is an actively managed fund by iShares. It was launched on Jun 21, 2007.

Performance

DXBB.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Dynamic Active Bond ETF (DXBB.TO) and iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio (XGRO.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DXBB.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024
DXBB.TO
Dynamic Active Bond ETF		0.40%2.85%1.32%
XGRO.TO
iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio		0.51%15.59%2.62%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DXBB.TO achieves a 0.40% return, which is significantly lower than XGRO.TO's 0.51% return.

DXBB.TO

1D
0.31%
1M
-1.59%
YTD
0.40%
6M
0.44%
1Y
1.58%
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

XGRO.TO

1D
2.22%
1M
-3.88%
YTD
0.51%
6M
1.47%
1Y
15.73%
3Y*
14.73%
5Y*
9.23%
10Y*
9.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Dynamic Active Bond ETF

iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio

Often compared with DXBB.TO:
DXBB.TO vs. DXU.TODXBB.TO vs. XAGG.TODXBB.TO vs. DXMO.TO
Often compared with XGRO.TO:
XGRO.TO vs. XEQT.TOXGRO.TO vs. VGRO.TOXGRO.TO vs. VEQT.TOXGRO.TO vs. XCG.TOXGRO.TO vs. TGRO.TOXGRO.TO vs. ZGRO.TOXGRO.TO vs. XAW.TO

DXBB.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

DXBB.TO has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than XGRO.TO's 0.20% expense ratio.

DXBB.TO
Dynamic Active Bond ETF
XGRO.TO
iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio

Return for Risk

DXBB.TO vs. XGRO.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
DXBB.TO
DXBB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
DXBB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DXBB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
DXBB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
DXBB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
DXBB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
XGRO.TO
XGRO.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
XGRO.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XGRO.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
XGRO.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
XGRO.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
XGRO.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DXBB.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dynamic Active Bond ETF (DXBB.TO) and iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio (XGRO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

DXBB.TOXGRO.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.35

1.17

-0.82

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.50

1.66

-1.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.25

-0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.84

1.65

-0.82

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.85

7.36

-5.51

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DXBB.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DXBB.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.35, which is lower than the XGRO.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DXBB.TO and XGRO.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

DXBB.TOXGRO.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

1.17

-0.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

—

0.85

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.78

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.33

+0.33

Correlation

The correlation between DXBB.TO and XGRO.TO is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

DXBB.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Dividend Comparison

DXBB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.27%, more than XGRO.TO's 1.93% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DXBB.TO
Dynamic Active Bond ETF		4.27%4.24%0.89%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XGRO.TO
iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio		1.93%1.92%1.98%2.22%1.86%1.66%1.94%2.21%7.42%2.04%2.65%2.15%

Drawdowns

DXBB.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DXBB.TO drawdown since its inception was -3.23%, smaller than the maximum XGRO.TO drawdown of -47.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXBB.TO and XGRO.TO.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

DXBB.TOXGRO.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.23%

-47.97%

+44.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.79%

-9.78%

+6.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-18.40%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-25.85%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.74%

-4.37%

+2.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.21%

-8.56%

+7.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.26%

2.20%

-0.94%

Volatility

DXBB.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dynamic Active Bond ETF (DXBB.TO) is 2.06%, while iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio (XGRO.TO) has a volatility of 6.06%. This indicates that DXBB.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XGRO.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

DXBB.TOXGRO.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.06%

6.06%

-4.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.12%

8.59%

-5.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.52%

13.49%

-8.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.95%

10.89%

-5.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.95%

12.20%

-7.25%