DXBB.TO vs. DXMO.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Dynamic Active Bond ETF (DXBB.TO) and Dynamic Active Mining Opportunities ETF (DXMO.TO).

DXBB.TO and DXMO.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DXBB.TO is an actively managed fund by Dynamic. It was launched on Oct 31, 2024. DXMO.TO is an actively managed fund by Dynamic. It was launched on Jul 2, 2024.

Performance

DXBB.TO vs. DXMO.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Dynamic Active Bond ETF (DXBB.TO) and Dynamic Active Mining Opportunities ETF (DXMO.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

DXBB.TO vs. DXMO.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
DXBB.TO Dynamic Active Bond ETF	0.40%	2.85%	1.32%
DXMO.TO Dynamic Active Mining Opportunities ETF	3.52%	88.43%	-9.71%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DXBB.TO achieves a 0.40% return, which is significantly lower than DXMO.TO's 3.52% return.

DXBB.TO

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: -1.59%
• YTD: 0.40%
• 6M: 0.44%
• 1Y: 1.58%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DXMO.TO

• 1D: 6.73%
• 1M: -15.48%
• YTD: 3.52%
• 6M: 16.91%
• 1Y: 70.88%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DXBB.TO vs. DXMO.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

DXBB.TO has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than DXMO.TO's 0.74% expense ratio.

DXMO.TO

Dynamic Active Mining Opportunities ETF

DXBB.TO

Dynamic Active Bond ETF

Return for Risk

DXBB.TO vs. DXMO.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DXBB.TO

DXBB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 23
DXBB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
DXBB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
DXBB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 18
DXBB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
DXBB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 24

DXMO.TO

DXMO.TO Risk / Return Rank: 87
DXMO.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
DXMO.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
DXMO.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 86
DXMO.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
DXMO.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DXBB.TO vs. DXMO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dynamic Active Bond ETF (DXBB.TO) and Dynamic Active Mining Opportunities ETF (DXMO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DXBB.TO	DXMO.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.35	1.95	-1.60
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.50	2.33	-1.83
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.35	-0.28
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.84	2.71	-1.88
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.85	10.08	-8.23
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DXBB.TO vs. DXMO.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DXBB.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.35, which is lower than the DXMO.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DXBB.TO and DXMO.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DXBB.TO	DXMO.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.35	1.95	-1.60
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.66	1.15	-0.49

Correlation

The correlation between DXBB.TO and DXMO.TO is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

DXBB.TO vs. DXMO.TO - Dividend Comparison

DXBB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.27%, more than DXMO.TO's 0.17% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024
DXBB.TO Dynamic Active Bond ETF	4.27%	4.24%	0.89%
DXMO.TO Dynamic Active Mining Opportunities ETF	0.17%	0.18%	0.50%

Drawdowns

DXBB.TO vs. DXMO.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DXBB.TO drawdown since its inception was -3.23%, smaller than the maximum DXMO.TO drawdown of -26.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXBB.TO and DXMO.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	DXBB.TO	DXMO.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.23%	-26.12%	+22.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.79%	-26.12%	+23.33%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.74%	-16.37%	+14.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.21%	-5.19%	+3.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.26%	7.03%	-5.77%

Volatility

DXBB.TO vs. DXMO.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dynamic Active Bond ETF (DXBB.TO) is 2.06%, while Dynamic Active Mining Opportunities ETF (DXMO.TO) has a volatility of 16.47%. This indicates that DXBB.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DXMO.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DXBB.TO	DXMO.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.06%	16.47%	-14.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.12%	30.33%	-27.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.52%	36.47%	-31.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.95%	34.02%	-29.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.95%	34.02%	-29.07%