PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DWX vs. RFDI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DWX vs. RFDI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P International Dividend ETF (DWX) and First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Developed International ETF (RFDI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DWX achieves a 6.32% return, which is significantly lower than RFDI's 10.03% return. Over the past 10 years, DWX has underperformed RFDI with an annualized return of 7.87%, while RFDI has yielded a comparatively higher 8.96% annualized return.


DWX

1D
-0.12%
1M
-0.67%
YTD
6.32%
6M
7.53%
1Y
16.05%
3Y*
15.47%
5Y*
7.53%
10Y*
7.87%

RFDI

1D
0.10%
1M
1.74%
YTD
10.03%
6M
11.07%
1Y
27.77%
3Y*
18.86%
5Y*
8.91%
10Y*
8.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DWX vs. RFDI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DWX
SPDR S&P International Dividend ETF
6.32%31.62%2.56%14.74%-12.99%10.56%-5.10%20.26%-11.11%18.91%
RFDI
First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Developed International ETF
10.03%35.95%5.56%18.14%-23.57%17.36%9.16%20.47%-18.26%24.08%

Correlation

The correlation between DWX and RFDI is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 14, 2016

0.83

The correlation between DWX and RFDI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

DWX vs. RFDI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DWX
RFDI

Financial Services

16.5%
27.8%

Communication Services

12.9%
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

12.8%
7.0%

Utilities

10.7%
4.4%

Industrials

10.5%
11.6%

Energy

10.3%
10.6%

Real Estate

10.1%
1.9%

Consumer Cyclical

6.3%
10.5%

Healthcare

4.3%
8.6%

Technology

3.4%
7.6%

Basic Materials

2.2%
5.0%

Financial Services

DWX
16.5%
RFDI
27.8%

Communication Services

DWX
12.9%
RFDI
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

DWX
12.8%
RFDI
7.0%

Utilities

DWX
10.7%
RFDI
4.4%

Industrials

DWX
10.5%
RFDI
11.6%

Energy

DWX
10.3%
RFDI
10.6%

Real Estate

DWX
10.1%
RFDI
1.9%

Consumer Cyclical

DWX
6.3%
RFDI
10.5%

Healthcare

DWX
4.3%
RFDI
8.6%

Technology

DWX
3.4%
RFDI
7.6%

Basic Materials

DWX
2.2%
RFDI
5.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DWX vs. RFDI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DWX
DWX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
DWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
DWX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
DWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
DWX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

RFDI
RFDI Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
RFDI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFDI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFDI Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
RFDI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFDI Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DWX vs. RFDI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P International Dividend ETF (DWX) and First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Developed International ETF (RFDI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DWXRFDIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.32

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

2.58

-0.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.85

9.31

-3.46

DWX vs. RFDI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DWX Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the RFDI Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DWX and RFDI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DWX vs. RFDI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DWX drawdown since its inception was -66.86%, which is greater than RFDI's maximum drawdown of -39.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWX and RFDI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DWXRFDIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.86%

-39.40%

-27.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.59%

-10.20%

+1.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.65%

-13.44%

+2.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.96%

-35.87%

+8.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.05%

-39.40%

+3.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.04%

-0.65%

-3.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.10%

-9.20%

-4.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.75%

2.82%

-0.07%

Volatility

DWX vs. RFDI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P International Dividend ETF (DWX) is 2.95%, while First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Developed International ETF (RFDI) has a volatility of 4.55%. This indicates that DWX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RFDI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DWXRFDIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.95%

4.55%

-1.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.94%

12.41%

-3.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.01%

14.83%

-3.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.23%

16.82%

-4.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.02%

17.34%

-2.32%

DWX vs. RFDI - Expense Ratio Comparison

DWX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than RFDI's 0.83% expense ratio.


Dividends

DWX vs. RFDI - Dividend Comparison

DWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.72%, more than RFDI's 3.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DWX
SPDR S&P International Dividend ETF
5.72%4.44%4.31%4.12%4.68%3.89%3.84%4.40%5.06%3.85%5.25%5.81%
RFDI
First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Developed International ETF
3.20%3.45%5.21%2.43%5.00%3.22%1.34%2.72%2.59%1.63%1.85%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DWX and RFDI have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RFDI has higher volatility (4.55%) compared to DWX (2.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWX dropped -66.86% vs RFDI's -39.40%.

On 10-year performance, RFDI leads with 8.96% vs 7.87% for DWX. On fees, DWX is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, DWX has been the lower-risk option at 2.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, RFDI has performed better with a 8.96% return vs 7.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DWX is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.83% for RFDI.

DWX has the higher dividend yield at 5.72%, compared with 3.20% for RFDI.

They also come from different issuers: State Street and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for DWX and 0.83% for RFDI.

RFDI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DWX and RFDI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer