PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DWX vs. CIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DWX vs. CIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P International Dividend ETF (DWX) and VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DWX achieves a 10.64% return, which is significantly higher than CIL's 5.44% return. Over the past 10 years, DWX has underperformed CIL with an annualized return of 7.29%, while CIL has yielded a comparatively higher 8.18% annualized return.


DWX

1D
-0.42%
1M
3.07%
6M
6.49%
YTD
10.64%
1Y
19.67%
3Y*
16.41%
5Y*
8.12%
10Y*
7.29%
ALL TIME*
2.78%

CIL

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
6M
0.00%
YTD
5.44%
1Y
16.21%
3Y*
15.35%
5Y*
7.16%
10Y*
8.18%
ALL TIME*
7.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$956.39K$1.20M$907.10K

DWX vs. CIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DWX
SPDR S&P International Dividend ETF
10.64%31.62%2.56%14.74%-12.99%10.56%-5.10%20.26%-11.11%18.91%
CIL
VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF
5.44%32.99%3.76%16.29%-16.00%11.07%7.21%19.13%-13.34%27.67%

Correlation

The correlation between DWX and CIL is 0.50, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2015

0.66

The correlation between DWX and CIL shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.73 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DWX vs. CIL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DWX
CIL

Financial Services

17.3%
24.8%

Consumer Defensive

13.1%
8.8%

Communication Services

12.1%
5.8%

Industrials

10.6%
18.4%

Utilities

10.6%
6.6%

Real Estate

10.2%
2.2%

Energy

10.1%
4.6%

Consumer Cyclical

6.6%
8.2%

Healthcare

4.4%
7.7%

Technology

2.9%
6.4%

Basic Materials

2.1%
6.6%

Financial Services

DWX
17.3%
CIL
24.8%

Consumer Defensive

DWX
13.1%
CIL
8.8%

Communication Services

DWX
12.1%
CIL
5.8%

Industrials

DWX
10.6%
CIL
18.4%

Utilities

DWX
10.6%
CIL
6.6%

Real Estate

DWX
10.2%
CIL
2.2%

Energy

DWX
10.1%
CIL
4.6%

Consumer Cyclical

DWX
6.6%
CIL
8.2%

Healthcare

DWX
4.4%
CIL
7.7%

Technology

DWX
2.9%
CIL
6.4%

Basic Materials

DWX
2.1%
CIL
6.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DWX vs. CIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DWX
DWX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
DWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
DWX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
DWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
DWX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

CIL
CIL Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
CIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIL Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
CIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIL Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DWX vs. CIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P International Dividend ETF (DWX) and VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DWXCILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.67

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.30

3.68

-1.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.96

18.39

-11.43

DWX vs. CIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DWX Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the CIL Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DWX and CIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DWX vs. CIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DWX drawdown since its inception was -66.86%, which is greater than CIL's maximum drawdown of -36.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWX and CIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DWXCILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.86%

-36.27%

-30.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.59%

-4.60%

-3.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.65%

-11.29%

+0.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.96%

-29.89%

+2.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.05%

-36.27%

+0.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.68%

-0.58%

-1.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.02%

-6.47%

-7.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.83%

1.03%

+1.80%

Volatility

DWX vs. CIL - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P International Dividend ETF (DWX) has a higher volatility of 2.85% compared to VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL) at 0.00%. This indicates that DWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DWXCILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.85%

0.00%

+2.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.22%

2.31%

+6.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.05%

6.77%

+4.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.25%

16.39%

-4.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.72%

16.74%

-2.02%

DWX vs. CIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DWX and CIL have an expense ratio of 0.45%.


Dividends

DWX vs. CIL - Dividend Comparison

DWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, more than CIL's 1.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIL
VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF
1.05%2.70%3.46%2.91%2.41%3.04%1.73%2.69%2.85%2.17%2.34%0.43%
DWX
SPDR S&P International Dividend ETF
4.12%4.44%4.31%4.12%4.68%3.89%3.84%4.40%5.06%3.85%5.25%5.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


DWX and CIL have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DWX has higher volatility (2.85%) compared to CIL (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWX dropped -66.86% vs CIL's -36.27%.

On 10-year performance, CIL leads with 8.18% vs 7.29% for DWX. Both ETFs have the same 0.45% expense ratio. On volatility, CIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, CIL has performed better with a 8.18% return vs 7.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DWX and CIL have the same expense ratio: 0.45% per year.

DWX has the higher dividend yield at 4.12%, compared with 1.05% for CIL.

DWX tracks S&P International Dividend Opportunities Index, while CIL tracks Nasdaq Victory International 500 Volatility Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Crestview.

CIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DWX and CIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer