DWX vs. CIL

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

DWX (SPDR S&P International Dividend ETF) and CIL (VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - DWX tracks the S&P International Dividend Opportunities Index while CIL tracks the Nasdaq Victory International 500 Volatility Weighted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DWX returned 7.32%/yr vs 8.21%/yr for CIL. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.45% expense ratio.

Performance

DWX vs. CIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P International Dividend ETF (DWX) and VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DWX achieves a 6.54% return, which is significantly higher than CIL's 5.44% return. Over the past 10 years, DWX has underperformed CIL with an annualized return of 7.32%, while CIL has yielded a comparatively higher 8.21% annualized return.

DWX

• 1D: -0.01%
• 1M: -0.12%
• YTD: 6.54%
• 6M: 9.07%
• 1Y: 15.35%
• 3Y*: 15.08%
• 5Y*: 7.37%
• 10Y*: 7.32%

CIL

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 5.44%
• 6M: 8.27%
• 1Y: 16.20%
• 3Y*: 15.59%
• 5Y*: 7.45%
• 10Y*: 8.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DWX vs. CIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DWX SPDR S&P International Dividend ETF	6.54%	31.62%	2.56%	14.74%	-12.99%	10.56%	-5.10%	20.26%	-11.11%	18.91%
CIL VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF	5.44%	32.99%	3.76%	16.29%	-16.00%	11.07%	7.21%	19.13%	-13.34%	27.67%

Correlation

The correlation between DWX and CIL is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.76
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2015	0.66

The correlation between DWX and CIL shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.76 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DWX vs. CIL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DWX	CIL
Financial Services	16.4%	24.8%
Communication Services	12.8%	5.8%
Consumer Defensive	12.6%	8.8%
Utilities	11.3%	6.6%
Real Estate	10.5%	2.2%
Energy	10.4%	4.6%
Industrials	10.2%	18.4%
Consumer Cyclical	6.2%	8.2%
Healthcare	4.5%	7.7%
Technology	2.8%	6.4%
Basic Materials	2.3%	6.6%

Return for Risk

DWX vs. CIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DWX

DWX Risk / Return Rank: 39
DWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
DWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
DWX Omega Ratio Rank: 40
DWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
DWX Martin Ratio Rank: 39

CIL

CIL Risk / Return Rank: 73
CIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
CIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
CIL Omega Ratio Rank: 73
CIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
CIL Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DWX vs. CIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P International Dividend ETF (DWX) and VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DWX	CIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.43	2.07	-0.64
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.01	2.96	-0.96
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.45	-0.18
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.90	4.32	-2.42
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.21	18.62	-12.41
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DWX vs. CIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DWX Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is lower than the CIL Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DWX and CIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DWX	CIL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.43	2.07	-0.64
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61	0.46	+0.15
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.49	0.48	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.12	0.43	-0.31

Drawdowns

DWX vs. CIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DWX drawdown since its inception was -66.86%, which is greater than CIL's maximum drawdown of -36.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWX and CIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	DWX	CIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.86%	-36.27%	-30.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.59%	-4.60%	-3.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.65%	-11.96%	+1.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.96%	-29.89%	+2.93%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.05%	-36.27%	+0.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.85%	-0.58%	-3.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.13%	-6.56%	-7.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.62%	1.07%	+1.55%

Volatility

DWX vs. CIL - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P International Dividend ETF (DWX) has a higher volatility of 3.08% compared to VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL) at 0.00%. This indicates that DWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DWX	CIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.08%	0.00%	+3.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.69%	4.42%	+4.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.82%	8.26%	+2.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.21%	16.49%	-4.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.09%	17.18%	-2.09%

DWX vs. CIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DWX and CIL have an expense ratio of 0.45%.

Dividends

DWX vs. CIL - Dividend Comparison

DWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%, more than CIL's 1.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CIL VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF	1.67%	2.70%	3.46%	2.91%	2.41%	3.04%	1.73%	2.69%	2.85%	2.17%	2.34%	0.43%
DWX SPDR S&P International Dividend ETF	4.19%	4.44%	4.31%	4.12%	4.68%	3.89%	3.84%	4.40%	5.06%	3.85%	5.25%	5.81%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DWX and CIL in my portfolio?

DWX and CIL have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DWX or CIL?

DWX has higher volatility (3.08%) compared to CIL (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWX dropped -66.86% vs CIL's -36.27%.

Which ETF is better, DWX or CIL?

On 10-year performance, CIL leads with 8.21% vs 7.32% for DWX. Both ETFs have the same 0.45% expense ratio. On volatility, CIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DWX or CIL?

Over the 10-year period, CIL has performed better with a 8.21% return vs 7.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DWX or CIL?

DWX and CIL have the same expense ratio: 0.45% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DWX or CIL?

DWX has the higher dividend yield at 4.19%, compared with 1.67% for CIL.

What is the main difference between DWX and CIL?

DWX tracks S&P International Dividend Opportunities Index, while CIL tracks Nasdaq Victory International 500 Volatility Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Crestview.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.