PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DWUSX vs. DFUSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DWUSX vs. DFUSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA World ex U.S. Targeted Value Portfolio (DWUSX) and DFA U.S. Large Company Portfolio (DFUSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DWUSX achieves a 13.78% return, which is significantly higher than DFUSX's 9.80% return. Over the past 10 years, DWUSX has underperformed DFUSX with an annualized return of 12.10%, while DFUSX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.66% annualized return.


DWUSX

1D
0.05%
1M
1.57%
YTD
13.78%
6M
13.43%
1Y
34.99%
3Y*
22.69%
5Y*
13.53%
10Y*
12.10%

DFUSX

1D
-0.36%
1M
0.12%
YTD
9.80%
6M
8.80%
1Y
25.48%
3Y*
21.34%
5Y*
13.54%
10Y*
15.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DWUSX vs. DFUSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DWUSX
DFA World ex U.S. Targeted Value Portfolio
13.78%39.16%5.31%17.40%-11.83%26.30%4.96%17.39%-20.38%30.95%
DFUSX
DFA U.S. Large Company Portfolio
9.80%17.76%24.91%26.28%-18.14%28.53%18.41%32.08%-4.45%21.04%

Correlation

The correlation between DWUSX and DFUSX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013

0.72

The correlation between DWUSX and DFUSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DWUSX vs. DFUSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DWUSX
DWUSX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
DWUSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DWUSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
DWUSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
DWUSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
DWUSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

DFUSX
DFUSX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
DFUSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFUSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFUSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
DFUSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFUSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DWUSX vs. DFUSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA World ex U.S. Targeted Value Portfolio (DWUSX) and DFA U.S. Large Company Portfolio (DFUSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DWUSXDFUSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.40

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.22

3.05

+0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.06

13.76

-1.70

DWUSX vs. DFUSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DWUSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is comparable to the DFUSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DWUSX and DFUSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DWUSX vs. DFUSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DWUSX drawdown since its inception was -49.65%, smaller than the maximum DFUSX drawdown of -54.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWUSX and DFUSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DWUSXDFUSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.65%

-54.96%

+5.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.26%

-8.88%

-2.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.03%

-18.76%

+5.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.71%

-24.58%

-2.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.65%

-33.79%

-15.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.63%

-1.70%

+1.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.63%

-10.58%

+1.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.99%

1.95%

+1.04%

Volatility

DWUSX vs. DFUSX - Volatility Comparison

DFA World ex U.S. Targeted Value Portfolio (DWUSX) has a higher volatility of 5.01% compared to DFA U.S. Large Company Portfolio (DFUSX) at 4.72%. This indicates that DWUSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFUSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DWUSXDFUSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.01%

4.72%

+0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.66%

9.87%

+1.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.65%

12.23%

+1.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.34%

16.96%

-1.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.95%

18.12%

-2.17%

DWUSX vs. DFUSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DWUSX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than DFUSX's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

DWUSX vs. DFUSX - Dividend Comparison

DWUSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, more than DFUSX's 0.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFUSX
DFA U.S. Large Company Portfolio
0.97%1.04%1.24%4.17%6.24%6.57%3.82%2.74%2.64%1.56%1.95%2.87%
DWUSX
DFA World ex U.S. Targeted Value Portfolio
2.45%2.64%2.86%2.81%2.91%16.59%1.37%3.22%5.51%3.18%1.94%1.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


DWUSX and DFUSX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DWUSX has higher volatility (5.01%) compared to DFUSX (4.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWUSX dropped -49.65% vs DFUSX's -54.96%.

DWUSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DWUSX and DFUSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer