DWUSX vs. LZISX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

DWUSX (DFA World ex U.S. Targeted Value Portfolio) and LZISX (Lazard International Small Cap Equity Portfolio) are both Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, DWUSX returned 11.05%/yr vs 7.17%/yr for LZISX. Their correlation of 0.85 means they have usually moved in the same direction. DWUSX charges 0.52%/yr vs 1.14%/yr for LZISX.

Performance

DWUSX vs. LZISX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA World ex U.S. Targeted Value Portfolio (DWUSX) and Lazard International Small Cap Equity Portfolio (LZISX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DWUSX achieves a 12.13% return, which is significantly lower than LZISX's 18.32% return. Over the past 10 years, DWUSX has outperformed LZISX with an annualized return of 11.05%, while LZISX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.17% annualized return.

DWUSX

• 1D: 2.39%
• 1M: 0.75%
• 6M: 5.19%
• YTD: 12.13%
• 1Y: 28.59%
• 3Y*: 19.27%
• 5Y*: 13.36%
• 10Y*: 11.05%
• ALL TIME*: 9.32%

LZISX

• 1D: 3.55%
• 1M: -6.00%
• 6M: 8.86%
• YTD: 18.32%
• 1Y: 26.20%
• 3Y*: 16.73%
• 5Y*: 4.72%
• 10Y*: 7.17%
• ALL TIME*: 6.87%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DWUSX DFA World ex U.S. Targeted Value Portfolio	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
LZISX Lazard International Small Cap Equity Portfolio	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

DWUSX vs. LZISX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DWUSX DFA World ex U.S. Targeted Value Portfolio	12.13%	39.16%	5.31%	17.40%	-11.83%	26.30%	4.96%	17.39%	-20.38%	30.95%
LZISX Lazard International Small Cap Equity Portfolio	18.32%	35.95%	-3.68%	11.59%	-26.34%	12.36%	13.45%	25.49%	-24.90%	36.67%

Correlation

The correlation between DWUSX and LZISX is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.75
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.86
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013	0.85

The correlation between DWUSX and LZISX shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.86 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

DWUSX vs. LZISX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DWUSX

DWUSX Risk / Return Rank: 77
DWUSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
DWUSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
DWUSX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
DWUSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
DWUSX Martin Ratio Rank: 71

LZISX

LZISX Risk / Return Rank: 47
LZISX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
LZISX Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
LZISX Omega Ratio Rank: 39
LZISX Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
LZISX Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DWUSX vs. LZISX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA World ex U.S. Targeted Value Portfolio (DWUSX) and Lazard International Small Cap Equity Portfolio (LZISX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DWUSX	LZISX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.96	1.24	+0.72
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.73	1.78	+0.95
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.22	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.49	2.11	+0.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.91	7.16	+1.75

DWUSX vs. LZISX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DWUSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is higher than the LZISX Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DWUSX and LZISX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DWUSX vs. LZISX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DWUSX drawdown since its inception was -49.65%, smaller than the maximum LZISX drawdown of -65.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWUSX and LZISX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DWUSX	LZISX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.65%	-65.43%	+15.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.26%	-12.57%	+1.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.03%	-15.88%	+2.85%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.71%	-42.01%	+15.30%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-49.65%	-44.80%	-4.85%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.07%	-9.47%	+7.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.58%	-14.73%	+6.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.13%	3.70%	-0.57%

Volatility

DWUSX vs. LZISX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DFA World ex U.S. Targeted Value Portfolio (DWUSX) is 4.90%, while Lazard International Small Cap Equity Portfolio (LZISX) has a volatility of 7.67%. This indicates that DWUSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LZISX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DWUSX	LZISX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.90%	7.67%	-2.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.55%	17.74%	-5.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.35%	21.48%	-7.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.44%	18.02%	-2.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.79%	17.04%	-1.25%

DWUSX vs. LZISX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DWUSX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than LZISX's 1.14% expense ratio.

Dividends

DWUSX vs. LZISX - Dividend Comparison

DWUSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%, more than LZISX's 1.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DWUSX DFA World ex U.S. Targeted Value Portfolio	2.64%	2.64%	2.86%	2.81%	2.91%	16.59%	1.37%	3.22%	5.51%	3.18%	1.94%	1.27%
LZISX Lazard International Small Cap Equity Portfolio	1.62%	1.91%	1.89%	2.08%	5.44%	36.78%	2.07%	2.10%	4.62%	0.00%	2.96%	0.69%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DWUSX and LZISX in my portfolio?

DWUSX and LZISX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DWUSX or LZISX?

LZISX has higher volatility (7.67%) compared to DWUSX (4.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWUSX dropped -49.65% vs LZISX's -65.43%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DWUSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.