DWSH vs. TSLS
DWSH (AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF) and TSLS (Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. DWSH is actively managed, while TSLS is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DWSH returned -4.29%/yr vs -29.03%/yr for TSLS. Their 0.37 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. DWSH charges 3.67%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for TSLS.
Performance
DWSH vs. TSLS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DWSH achieves a -11.96% return, which is significantly lower than TSLS's 28.69% return.
DWSH
- 1D
- -2.20%
- 1M
- -5.81%
- 6M
- -8.92%
- YTD
- -11.96%
- 1Y
- -17.15%
- 3Y*
- -4.29%
- 5Y*
- -4.38%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -14.49%
TSLS
- 1D
- -3.45%
- 1M
- 18.41%
- 6M
- 21.28%
- YTD
- 28.69%
- 1Y
- -17.90%
- 3Y*
- -29.03%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -25.83%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $237.81K | $562.58K | $421.31K | |
| $28.31M | $26.86M | $30.95M |
DWSH vs. TSLS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWSH AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF | -11.96% | -2.57% | 5.98% | -22.04% | 13.31% |
TSLS Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X ETF | 28.69% | -34.95% | -55.71% | -60.12% | 105.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between DWSH and TSLS is 0.17, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2022 | 0.37 |
Over the past year, the correlation between DWSH and TSLS has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.37, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DWSH vs. TSLS — Risk / Return Rank
DWSH
TSLS
DWSH vs. TSLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF (DWSH) and Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X ETF (TSLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DWSH | TSLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 0.97 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.86 | -0.45 | -0.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.88 | -0.64 | -1.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DWSH vs. TSLS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DWSH drawdown since its inception was -83.80%, smaller than the maximum TSLS drawdown of -90.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWSH and TSLS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DWSH | TSLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.80% | -90.73% | +6.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.08% | -40.10% | +20.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.61% | -84.16% | +50.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -83.64% | -87.03% | +3.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.95% | -64.46% | +0.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.24% | 29.55% | -20.31% |
Volatility
DWSH vs. TSLS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF (DWSH) is 12.14%, while Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X ETF (TSLS) has a volatility of 18.53%. This indicates that DWSH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DWSH | TSLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.14% | 18.53% | -6.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.18% | 33.99% | -15.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.70% | 46.87% | -24.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.59% | 58.97% | -32.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.27% | 58.97% | -27.70% |
DWSH vs. TSLS - Expense Ratio Comparison
DWSH has a 3.67% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLS's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
DWSH vs. TSLS - Dividend Comparison
DWSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.17%, more than TSLS's 2.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWSH AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF | 7.17% | 6.31% | 6.17% | 10.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 0.12% |
TSLS Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X ETF | 2.44% | 4.30% | 7.62% | 4.52% | 3.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DWSH and TSLS have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLS has higher volatility (18.53%) compared to DWSH (12.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWSH dropped -83.80% vs TSLS's -90.73%.
On 3-year performance, DWSH leads with -4.29% vs -29.03% for TSLS. On fees, TSLS is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, DWSH has been the lower-risk option at 12.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DWSH has performed better with a -4.29% return vs -29.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TSLS is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 3.67% for DWSH.
DWSH has the higher dividend yield at 7.17%, compared with 2.44% for TSLS.
They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 3.67% for DWSH and 0.95% for TSLS.
TSLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.38 vs -0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DWSH and TSLS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer