DWSH vs. CARD
DWSH (AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF) and CARD (Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) are both Inverse Equities funds. DWSH is actively managed, while CARD is passively managed. Over the past year, DWSH returned -10.40% vs -35.78% for CARD. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DWSH charges 3.67%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for CARD.
Performance
DWSH vs. CARD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DWSH achieves a 0.85% return, which is significantly higher than CARD's -2.60% return.
DWSH
- 1D
- 2.36%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- YTD
- 0.85%
- 6M
- 1.07%
- 1Y
- -10.40%
- 3Y*
- -4.14%
- 5Y*
- -1.61%
- 10Y*
- —
CARD
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- -13.67%
- YTD
- -2.60%
- 6M
- -2.07%
- 1Y
- -35.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DWSH vs. CARD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DWSH AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF | 0.85% | -2.57% | 5.98% | -13.25% |
CARD Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | -2.60% | -60.21% | -58.19% | -30.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between DWSH and CARD is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2023 | 0.66 |
The correlation between DWSH and CARD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DWSH vs. CARD — Risk / Return Rank
DWSH
CARD
DWSH vs. CARD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF (DWSH) and Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DWSH | CARD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 0.95 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.58 | -0.72 | +0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.88 | -1.06 | +0.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DWSH | CARD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.50 | -0.52 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.06 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.43 | -0.65 | +0.23 |
Drawdowns
DWSH vs. CARD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DWSH drawdown since its inception was -82.73%, smaller than the maximum CARD drawdown of -93.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWSH and CARD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DWSH | CARD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.73% | -93.51% | +10.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.08% | -49.57% | +31.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.87% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -81.25% | -92.68% | +11.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.61% | -68.13% | +4.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.82% | 33.93% | -22.11% |
Volatility
DWSH vs. CARD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF (DWSH) is 6.08%, while Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD) has a volatility of 22.80%. This indicates that DWSH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CARD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DWSH | CARD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.08% | 22.80% | -16.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.93% | 50.05% | -36.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.19% | 68.70% | -47.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.93% | 80.53% | -54.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.22% | 80.53% | -49.31% |
DWSH vs. CARD - Expense Ratio Comparison
DWSH has a 3.67% expense ratio, which is higher than CARD's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
DWSH vs. CARD - Dividend Comparison
DWSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.26%, while CARD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CARD Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DWSH AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF | 6.26% | 6.31% | 6.17% | 10.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 0.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DWSH and CARD have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CARD has higher volatility (22.80%) compared to DWSH (6.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWSH dropped -82.73% vs CARD's -93.51%.
On 1-year performance, DWSH leads with -10.40% vs -35.78% for CARD. On fees, CARD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, DWSH has been the lower-risk option at 6.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DWSH has performed better with a -10.40% return vs -35.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CARD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 3.67% for DWSH.
DWSH has the higher dividend yield at 6.26%, compared with 0.00% for CARD.
They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and Max. Their fees differ too: 3.67% for DWSH and 0.95% for CARD.
DWSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.50 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DWSH and CARD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer