DWSH vs. CALF
DWSH (AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF) and CALF (Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DWSH is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while CALF is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Index. DWSH is actively managed, while CALF is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DWSH returned -1.61%/yr vs 4.12%/yr for CALF. At a correlation of -0.81, they often move in opposite directions. DWSH charges 3.67%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for CALF.
Performance
DWSH vs. CALF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DWSH achieves a 0.85% return, which is significantly lower than CALF's 13.34% return.
DWSH
- 1D
- 2.36%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- YTD
- 0.85%
- 6M
- 1.07%
- 1Y
- -10.40%
- 3Y*
- -4.14%
- 5Y*
- -1.61%
- 10Y*
- —
CALF
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- 4.91%
- YTD
- 13.34%
- 6M
- 12.53%
- 1Y
- 30.24%
- 3Y*
- 10.69%
- 5Y*
- 4.12%
- 10Y*
- —
DWSH vs. CALF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWSH AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF | 0.85% | -2.57% | 5.98% | -22.04% | 17.45% | -25.74% | -49.95% | -25.27% | 22.28% |
CALF Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF | 13.34% | 2.33% | -7.41% | 35.43% | -15.20% | 40.68% | 16.55% | 18.18% | -20.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between DWSH and CALF is -0.86, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2018 | -0.81 |
The correlation between DWSH and CALF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.86 to -0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
DWSH vs. CALF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DWSH
CALF
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
Energy
Communication Services
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Technology
Utilities
DWSH
-
CALF
-
Basic Materials
DWSH
CALF
Energy
DWSH
CALF
Communication Services
DWSH
CALF
Real Estate
DWSH
CALF
Consumer Defensive
DWSH
CALF
Financial Services
DWSH
CALF
Healthcare
DWSH
CALF
Consumer Cyclical
DWSH
CALF
Industrials
DWSH
CALF
Technology
DWSH
CALF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DWSH vs. CALF — Risk / Return Rank
DWSH
CALF
DWSH vs. CALF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF (DWSH) and Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DWSH | CALF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.34 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.58 | 4.94 | -5.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.88 | 14.08 | -14.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DWSH | CALF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.50 | 1.93 | -2.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.06 | 0.18 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.43 | 0.37 | -0.80 |
Drawdowns
DWSH vs. CALF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DWSH drawdown since its inception was -82.73%, which is greater than CALF's maximum drawdown of -47.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWSH and CALF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DWSH | CALF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.73% | -47.58% | -35.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.08% | -6.15% | -11.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.23% | -34.22% | +4.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.87% | -34.22% | +1.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -81.25% | -1.95% | -79.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.61% | -10.74% | -52.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.82% | 2.15% | +9.67% |
Volatility
DWSH vs. CALF - Volatility Comparison
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF (DWSH) has a higher volatility of 6.08% compared to Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF) at 4.92%. This indicates that DWSH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CALF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DWSH | CALF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.08% | 4.92% | +1.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.93% | 10.47% | +3.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.19% | 15.84% | +5.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.93% | 23.44% | +2.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.22% | 26.02% | +5.20% |
DWSH vs. CALF - Expense Ratio Comparison
DWSH has a 3.67% expense ratio, which is higher than CALF's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
DWSH vs. CALF - Dividend Comparison
DWSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.26%, more than CALF's 1.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CALF Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF | 1.28% | 1.43% | 1.07% | 1.18% | 0.85% | 2.63% | 0.82% | 0.99% | 1.39% | 0.70% |
DWSH AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF | 6.26% | 6.31% | 6.17% | 10.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 0.12% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DWSH and CALF have a correlation of -0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DWSH has higher volatility (6.08%) compared to CALF (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWSH dropped -82.73% vs CALF's -47.58%.
On 5-year performance, CALF leads with 4.12% vs -1.61% for DWSH. On fees, CALF is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, CALF has been the lower-risk option at 4.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, CALF has performed better with a 4.12% return vs -1.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CALF is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 3.67% for DWSH.
DWSH has the higher dividend yield at 6.26%, compared with 1.28% for CALF.
DWSH is categorized as Inverse Equities, while CALF is Small Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 3.67% for DWSH and 0.59% for CALF.
CALF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs -0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DWSH and CALF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer