DWMF vs. NTSX
DWMF (WisdomTree International Multifactor Fund) and NTSX (WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - DWMF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by WisdomTree, while NTSX is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by WisdomTree. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DWMF returned 8.42%/yr vs 10.08%/yr for NTSX. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DWMF charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for NTSX.
Performance
DWMF vs. NTSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DWMF achieves a 2.60% return, which is significantly lower than NTSX's 9.77% return.
DWMF
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- -1.25%
- YTD
- 2.60%
- 6M
- 3.53%
- 1Y
- 7.67%
- 3Y*
- 13.33%
- 5Y*
- 8.42%
- 10Y*
- —
NTSX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 4.88%
- YTD
- 9.77%
- 6M
- 9.78%
- 1Y
- 27.16%
- 3Y*
- 19.80%
- 5Y*
- 10.08%
- 10Y*
- —
DWMF vs. NTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWMF WisdomTree International Multifactor Fund | 2.60% | 24.42% | 10.22% | 10.78% | -7.31% | 11.24% | -1.18% | 16.10% | -7.30% |
NTSX WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund | 9.77% | 18.82% | 20.20% | 22.70% | -25.84% | 22.21% | 24.87% | 32.03% | -9.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between DWMF and NTSX is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2018 | 0.66 |
The correlation between DWMF and NTSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
DWMF vs. NTSX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DWMF
NTSX
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Healthcare
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
DWMF
NTSX
Industrials
DWMF
NTSX
Consumer Defensive
DWMF
NTSX
Communication Services
DWMF
NTSX
Utilities
DWMF
NTSX
Healthcare
DWMF
NTSX
Real Estate
DWMF
NTSX
Consumer Cyclical
DWMF
NTSX
Technology
DWMF
NTSX
Basic Materials
DWMF
NTSX
Energy
DWMF
NTSX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DWMF vs. NTSX — Risk / Return Rank
DWMF
NTSX
DWMF vs. NTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree International Multifactor Fund (DWMF) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DWMF | NTSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.70 | 2.23 | -1.53 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.05 | 3.01 | -1.96 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.40 | -0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.01 | 3.00 | -1.99 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.00 | 13.28 | -10.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DWMF | NTSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 | 2.23 | -1.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | 0.60 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.72 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
DWMF vs. NTSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DWMF drawdown since its inception was -29.72%, smaller than the maximum NTSX drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWMF and NTSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DWMF | NTSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.72% | -31.34% | +1.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.74% | -9.16% | +0.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.74% | -16.82% | +8.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.00% | -31.34% | +14.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.46% | 0.00% | -6.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.90% | -6.80% | +2.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.94% | 2.07% | +0.87% |
Volatility
DWMF vs. NTSX - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree International Multifactor Fund (DWMF) has a higher volatility of 3.44% compared to WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) at 3.23%. This indicates that DWMF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NTSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DWMF | NTSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.44% | 3.23% | +0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.72% | 9.55% | -0.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.04% | 12.25% | -1.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.23% | 17.03% | -5.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.11% | 18.27% | -4.16% |
DWMF vs. NTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DWMF has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSX's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
DWMF vs. NTSX - Dividend Comparison
DWMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, more than NTSX's 1.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWMF WisdomTree International Multifactor Fund | 2.90% | 2.80% | 3.50% | 4.01% | 3.41% | 3.54% | 2.06% | 2.77% | 1.15% |
NTSX WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund | 1.06% | 1.14% | 1.14% | 1.21% | 1.36% | 0.82% | 0.92% | 1.42% | 0.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DWMF and NTSX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DWMF has higher volatility (3.44%) compared to NTSX (3.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWMF dropped -29.72% vs NTSX's -31.34%.
On 5-year performance, NTSX leads with 10.08% vs 8.42% for DWMF. On fees, NTSX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, NTSX has been the lower-risk option at 3.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, NTSX has performed better with a 10.08% return vs 8.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NTSX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for DWMF.
DWMF has the higher dividend yield at 2.90%, compared with 1.06% for NTSX.
DWMF is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while NTSX is Diversified Portfolio. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for DWMF and 0.20% for NTSX.
NTSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DWMF and NTSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer