PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DWMF vs. NTSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DWMF vs. NTSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree International Multifactor Fund (DWMF) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DWMF vs. NTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DWMF
WisdomTree International Multifactor Fund
3.84%24.42%10.22%10.78%-7.31%11.24%-1.18%16.10%-7.30%
NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
-4.59%18.82%20.20%22.70%-25.84%22.21%24.87%32.03%-9.37%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DWMF achieves a 3.84% return, which is significantly higher than NTSX's -4.59% return.


DWMF

1D
2.44%
1M
-5.33%
YTD
3.84%
6M
6.56%
1Y
18.87%
3Y*
14.10%
5Y*
9.33%
10Y*

NTSX

1D
2.78%
1M
-5.47%
YTD
-4.59%
6M
-2.72%
1Y
16.50%
3Y*
15.56%
5Y*
7.99%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DWMF vs. NTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DWMF has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSX's 0.20% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

DWMF vs. NTSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DWMF
DWMF Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
DWMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DWMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
DWMF Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
DWMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
DWMF Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

NTSX
NTSX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
NTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
NTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DWMF vs. NTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree International Multifactor Fund (DWMF) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DWMFNTSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.38

0.90

+0.48

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.02

1.32

+0.70

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.20

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

1.54

+0.60

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.12

6.64

+1.48

DWMF vs. NTSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DWMF Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is higher than the NTSX Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DWMF and NTSX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DWMFNTSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.38

0.90

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.47

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.62

-0.09

Correlation

The correlation between DWMF and NTSX is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

DWMF vs. NTSX - Dividend Comparison

DWMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, more than NTSX's 1.22% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DWMF
WisdomTree International Multifactor Fund
2.87%2.80%3.50%4.01%3.41%3.54%2.06%2.77%1.15%
NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
1.22%1.14%1.14%1.21%1.36%0.82%0.92%1.42%0.62%

Drawdowns

DWMF vs. NTSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DWMF drawdown since its inception was -29.72%, smaller than the maximum NTSX drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWMF and NTSX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DWMFNTSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.72%

-31.34%

+1.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.74%

-11.13%

+2.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.00%

-31.34%

+14.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.33%

-6.40%

+1.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.88%

-6.92%

+3.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.29%

2.57%

-0.28%

Volatility

DWMF vs. NTSX - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree International Multifactor Fund (DWMF) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) have volatilities of 5.84% and 6.11%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DWMFNTSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.84%

6.11%

-0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.39%

9.65%

-1.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.70%

18.39%

-4.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.20%

17.04%

-5.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.16%

18.39%

-4.23%