PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DWMF vs. NTSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DWMF vs. NTSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree International Multifactor Fund (DWMF) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DWMF achieves a 2.60% return, which is significantly lower than NTSX's 9.77% return.


DWMF

1D
0.05%
1M
-1.25%
YTD
2.60%
6M
3.53%
1Y
7.67%
3Y*
13.33%
5Y*
8.42%
10Y*

NTSX

1D
0.10%
1M
4.88%
YTD
9.77%
6M
9.78%
1Y
27.16%
3Y*
19.80%
5Y*
10.08%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DWMF vs. NTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DWMF
WisdomTree International Multifactor Fund
2.60%24.42%10.22%10.78%-7.31%11.24%-1.18%16.10%-7.30%
NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
9.77%18.82%20.20%22.70%-25.84%22.21%24.87%32.03%-9.37%

Correlation

The correlation between DWMF and NTSX is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2018

0.66

The correlation between DWMF and NTSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

DWMF vs. NTSX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DWMF
NTSX

Financial Services

20.0%
12.3%

Industrials

18.9%
7.7%

Consumer Defensive

11.5%
5.5%

Communication Services

9.5%
12.5%

Utilities

9.2%
2.1%

Healthcare

9.0%
8.4%

Real Estate

6.7%
1.5%

Consumer Cyclical

5.5%
10.1%

Technology

4.0%
35.1%

Basic Materials

3.7%
1.4%

Energy

2.0%
3.5%

Financial Services

DWMF
20.0%
NTSX
12.3%

Industrials

DWMF
18.9%
NTSX
7.7%

Consumer Defensive

DWMF
11.5%
NTSX
5.5%

Communication Services

DWMF
9.5%
NTSX
12.5%

Utilities

DWMF
9.2%
NTSX
2.1%

Healthcare

DWMF
9.0%
NTSX
8.4%

Real Estate

DWMF
6.7%
NTSX
1.5%

Consumer Cyclical

DWMF
5.5%
NTSX
10.1%

Technology

DWMF
4.0%
NTSX
35.1%

Basic Materials

DWMF
3.7%
NTSX
1.4%

Energy

DWMF
2.0%
NTSX
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DWMF vs. NTSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DWMF
DWMF Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
DWMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DWMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
DWMF Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
DWMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
DWMF Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

NTSX
NTSX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
NTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
NTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DWMF vs. NTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree International Multifactor Fund (DWMF) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DWMFNTSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.70

2.23

-1.53

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.05

3.01

-1.96

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.40

-0.27

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.01

3.00

-1.99

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.00

13.28

-10.28

DWMF vs. NTSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DWMF Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is lower than the NTSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DWMF and NTSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DWMFNTSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

2.23

-1.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.60

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.72

-0.21

Drawdowns

DWMF vs. NTSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DWMF drawdown since its inception was -29.72%, smaller than the maximum NTSX drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWMF and NTSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DWMFNTSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.72%

-31.34%

+1.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.74%

-9.16%

+0.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.74%

-16.82%

+8.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.00%

-31.34%

+14.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.46%

0.00%

-6.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.90%

-6.80%

+2.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.94%

2.07%

+0.87%

Volatility

DWMF vs. NTSX - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree International Multifactor Fund (DWMF) has a higher volatility of 3.44% compared to WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) at 3.23%. This indicates that DWMF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NTSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DWMFNTSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.44%

3.23%

+0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.72%

9.55%

-0.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.04%

12.25%

-1.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.23%

17.03%

-5.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.11%

18.27%

-4.16%

DWMF vs. NTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DWMF has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSX's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

DWMF vs. NTSX - Dividend Comparison

DWMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, more than NTSX's 1.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DWMF
WisdomTree International Multifactor Fund
2.90%2.80%3.50%4.01%3.41%3.54%2.06%2.77%1.15%
NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
1.06%1.14%1.14%1.21%1.36%0.82%0.92%1.42%0.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


DWMF and NTSX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DWMF has higher volatility (3.44%) compared to NTSX (3.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWMF dropped -29.72% vs NTSX's -31.34%.

On 5-year performance, NTSX leads with 10.08% vs 8.42% for DWMF. On fees, NTSX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, NTSX has been the lower-risk option at 3.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, NTSX has performed better with a 10.08% return vs 8.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NTSX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for DWMF.

DWMF has the higher dividend yield at 2.90%, compared with 1.06% for NTSX.

DWMF is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while NTSX is Diversified Portfolio. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for DWMF and 0.20% for NTSX.

NTSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DWMF and NTSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer